XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns
From: SaPeIsMa@gmail.com
"Tom McDonald" wrote in message
news:Ipspt.14715$MQ7.3462@newsfe18.iad...
> On 5/29/2013 2:09 PM, RD Sandman wrote:
>> "SaPeIsMa" wrote in
>> news:ko3psm$n3a$1@dont-email.me:
>>
>>> "Tom McDonald" wrote in message
>>> news:Z4uot.26866$CG1.14761@newsfe21.iad...
>>>> On 5/26/2013 12:52 PM, SaPeIsMa wrote:
>>>>> "Jeanne Douglas" wrote in message
>>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-08852C.17293125052013@news.giganews.com...
>>>>>> In article
>>>>>> ,
>>>>>> Jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article , "SaPeIsMa"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Jeanne Douglas" wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-E96C05.22033024052013@news.giganews.com...
>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>> ,
>>>>>>>>> Jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's possible that Cindy Thomas (IRS supervisor) was
>>>>>>>>>> following instructions she received from her bosses in the
>>>>>>>>>> White House.
>>>>>>> Read > >> this:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I read one report indicating that some liberal democrat
>>>>>>>>>> members of Congress that were upset about tea party group's
>>>>>>>>>> influence told Obama
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> his top aides that they should send the IRS after the tea
>>>>>>>>>> party groups.
>>>>>>>>>> That leads me to believe that it is possible that the IRS >
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> supervisors
>>>>>>>>>> such
>>>>>>>>>> as Cindy Thomas were following orders passed down from their
>>>>>>> bosses > >> in
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> White House.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why would she obey illegal orders.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Because she's a good little ideological drone ?
>>>>>>>> Because she doesn't have the brass to refuse ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And remember that the President has no power over
>>>>>>>>> non-politically-appointed workers.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The President has all kinds of power, both direct and indirect.
>>>>>>>> Hell, the promise that she would be taken care of and protected
>>>>>>>> if things
>>>>>>>> blow up would be good enough...
>>>>>>>> One woman got to become a US Supreme Court Justice for all the
>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>> she > did
>>>>>>>> to help push through Obamacare.
>>>>>>>> And she didn't even have the decency to recuse herself when the
>>>>>>> case > came
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> the Supreme Court.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I worked for a state agency before I retired. I worked with some
>>>>>>> employees
>>>>>>> just like Cindy Thomas. They would do whatever the boss told them
>>>>>>> to do (even if it was a violation of the rules). They knew that
>>>>>>> was the best way
>>>>>>> to get promotions. They were correct. Many of them got the
>>>>>>> promotions they
>>>>>>> were seeking since the top bosses knew they would obey their
>>>>>>> orders even
>>>>>>> if the orders were in violation of the rules or laws. We called
>>>>>>> them ass
>>>>>>> kissers and lap dogs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It worked out for the lady that Obama appointed to the supreme
>>>>>>> court.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What? What the fuck are you talking about?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah
>>>>> The one who didn't recuse herself as se should have when the
>>>>> Constitutionality of the law she helped create and push through came
>>>>> under review.
>>>>>
>>>> Would that be Scalia or Thomas?
>>>
>>>
>>> Poor baby, can't even read for comprehension
>>> What do you think the word "herself" implicits, dummy ?
>>> And neither Scalia nor Thomas were put on the Bench by Obama
>>
>> Nor are either one a "she".
>>
>>> Come back when you actually know something
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> You know, I know that. I was referring to the issue of justices not
> recusing themselves when they had a conflict of interest. Looks like I
> needed to be more clear.
LOL
The moron claimed that Scalia and Thomas should have recused themselves on
Bush vs Gore.
Now why would that be ?
But he ran away and plonked me to avoid answering that.
Poor little tommi-boi..
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
