XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: SaPeIsMa@gmail.com   
      
   "RD Sandman"  wrote in message   
   news:XnsA1CF7C78DE4ABhopewell@216.196.121.131...   
   > Tom McDonald  wrote in   
   > news:Kxopt.7866$OS5.970@newsfe24.iad:   
   >   
   >> On 5/29/2013 9:25 AM, SaPeIsMa wrote:   
   >>> "Tom McDonald"  wrote in message   
   >>> news:_bnpt.15217$uT3.13086@newsfe20.iad...   
   >>>> On 5/29/2013 7:36 AM, SaPeIsMa wrote:   
   >>>>> "Tom McDonald"  wrote in message   
   >>>>> news:%bept.42659$9X5.15117@newsfe31.iad...   
   >>>>>> On 5/28/2013 9:53 PM, SaPeIsMa wrote:   
   >>>>>>> "Jeanne Douglas"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-08852C.17293125052013@news.giganews.com...   
   >>>>>>>> In article   
   >>>>>>>> ,   
   >>>>>>>> Jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> In article , "SaPeIsMa"   
   >>>>>>>>>    
   >>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> > "Jeanne Douglas"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>> > news:hlwdjsd2-E96C05.22033024052013@news.giganews.com...   
   >>>>>>>>> > > In article   
   >>>>>>>>> > >    
   >>>>>>>>> > > , Jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> > >   
   >>>>>>>>> > >   
   >>>>>>>>> > >> It's possible that Cindy Thomas (IRS supervisor) was   
   >>>>>>>>> > >> following instructions she received from her bosses in the   
   >>>>>>>>> > >> White House.   
   >>>>>>>>> Read > >> this:   
   >>>>>>>>> > >>   
   >>>>>>>>> > >> I read one report indicating that some liberal democrat   
   >>>>>>>>> members of   
   >>>>>>>>> > >> Congress that were upset about tea party group's influence   
   >>>>>>>>> > >> told Obama   
   >>>>>>>>> > >> and   
   >>>>>>>>> > >> his top aides that they should send the IRS after the tea   
   >>>>>>>>> > >> party groups.   
   >>>>>>>>> > >> That leads me to believe that it is possible that the IRS   
   >>>>>>>>> > >> > >>   
   >>>>>>>>> supervisors   
   >>>>>>>>> > >> such   
   >>>>>>>>> > >> as Cindy Thomas were following orders passed down from   
   >>>>>>>>> > >> their   
   >>>>>>>>> bosses > >> in   
   >>>>>>>>> > >> the   
   >>>>>>>>> > >> White House.   
   >>>>>>>>> > >   
   >>>>>>>>> > > Why would she obey illegal orders.   
   >>>>>>>>> >   
   >>>>>>>>> > Because she's a good little ideological drone ?   
   >>>>>>>>> > Because she doesn't have the brass to refuse ?   
   >>>>>>>>> >   
   >>>>>>>>> >   
   >>>>>>>>> > >   
   >>>>>>>>> > > And remember that the President has no power over   
   >>>>>>>>> > > non-politically-appointed workers.   
   >>>>>>>>> > >   
   >>>>>>>>> >   
   >>>>>>>>> > The President has all kinds of power, both direct and   
   >>>>>>>>> > indirect. Hell, the promise that she would be taken care of   
   >>>>>>>>> > and protected if things   
   >>>>>>>>> > blow up would be good enough...   
   >>>>>>>>> > One woman got to become a US Supreme Court Justice for all   
   >>>>>>>>> > the   
   >>>>>>>>> work   
   >>>>>>>>> she > did   
   >>>>>>>>> > to help push through Obamacare.   
   >>>>>>>>> > And she didn't even have the decency to recuse herself when   
   >>>>>>>>> > the   
   >>>>>>>>> case > came   
   >>>>>>>>> > to   
   >>>>>>>>> > the Supreme Court.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> I worked for a state agency before I retired. I worked with   
   >>>>>>>>> some employees   
   >>>>>>>>> just like Cindy Thomas. They would do whatever the boss told   
   >>>>>>>>> them to do   
   >>>>>>>>> (even if it was a violation of the rules). They knew that was   
   >>>>>>>>> the best way   
   >>>>>>>>> to get promotions. They were correct. Many of them got the   
   >>>>>>>>> promotions   
   >>>>>>>>> they   
   >>>>>>>>> were seeking since the top bosses knew they would obey their   
   >>>>>>>>> orders even   
   >>>>>>>>> if the orders were in violation of the rules or laws. We called   
   >>>>>>>>> them ass   
   >>>>>>>>> kissers and lap dogs.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> It worked out for the lady that Obama appointed to the supreme   
   >>>>>>>>> court.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> What? What the fuck are you talking about?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> You really are this ignorant ??   
   >>>>>>> Let me repeat the clues for the clueless   
   >>>>>>>     ++ One woman got to become a US Supreme Court Justice   
   >>>>>>>     ++ for all the work she did  to help push through Obamacare.   
   >>>>>>>     ++ And she didn't even have the decency to recuse herself   
   >>>>>>>     ++ when the case came to the Supreme Court.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I'll give you another clue, because you are so stump-ignorant   
   >>>>>>>     Her name starts with a "K"..   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> So you are pissing and moaning about something Scalia and Thomas   
   >>>>>> do? ?> >  > Why?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> What are you babbling about now ?   
   >>>>> What are you claiming that Scalia and Thomas do ?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>  They didn't recuse themselves from cases in which they had a   
   >>>> conflict of interest. I thought that was fairly clear. Apparently   
   >>>> you need things spoon-fed you.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> What cases where those ?   
   >>> You're making the claims, YOU PROVE your claim   
   >>   
   >> Start with Bush v Gore.   
   >   
   > Huh?  What did they push through prior to Bush v Gore that was apropos to   
   > the case?   
   >   
   > Here, I will leave you room in which to place your answer.   
   >   
   > ==>   
   >   
      
   LOL   
   He most probably will kill-file you for asking..   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)