XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: lunch@nofreelunch.us   
      
   On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 17:56:02 +0000 (UTC), Zepp  wrote in   
   alt.atheism:   
      
   >On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 11:59:31 -0500, Free Lunch wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 08:33:04 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas   
   >>  wrote in alt.atheism:   
   >>   
   >>>I'd like to know how many folks in these groups support the planned US   
   >>>intervention in the civil war in Syria.   
   >>>   
   >>>Basically, a "Yes" or "No" is sufficient but if you want to provide a   
   >>>few sentences supporting your opinion, that's fine.   
   >>   
   >> Yes or No is never sufficient. Those are the answers of the unthinking.   
   >>   
   >> I have no idea what intervention is planned, so I cannot possibly   
   >> support a pig in a poke.   
   >   
   >Have you EVER seen a ground intervention in another country's civil war   
   >that went well?   
      
   There have been several from the past that were used as an excuse to   
   extend empire successfully. Modern-day intervention with the idea of   
   allowing the country to survive intact after the civil war? Seems   
   absurd.   
      
   Could someone tell me what the Kurds have done that unite Turkey, Syria,   
   Iran and Iran against them?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)