XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: lunch@nofreelunch.us   
      
   On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 13:13:48 -0500, Free Lunch    
   wrote in alt.atheism:   
      
   >On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 17:56:02 +0000 (UTC), Zepp  wrote in   
   >alt.atheism:   
   >   
   >>On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 11:59:31 -0500, Free Lunch wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 08:33:04 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas   
   >>>  wrote in alt.atheism:   
   >>>   
   >>>>I'd like to know how many folks in these groups support the planned US   
   >>>>intervention in the civil war in Syria.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Basically, a "Yes" or "No" is sufficient but if you want to provide a   
   >>>>few sentences supporting your opinion, that's fine.   
   >>>   
   >>> Yes or No is never sufficient. Those are the answers of the unthinking.   
   >>>   
   >>> I have no idea what intervention is planned, so I cannot possibly   
   >>> support a pig in a poke.   
   >>   
   >>Have you EVER seen a ground intervention in another country's civil war   
   >>that went well?   
   >   
   >There have been several from the past that were used as an excuse to   
   >extend empire successfully. Modern-day intervention with the idea of   
   >allowing the country to survive intact after the civil war? Seems   
   >absurd.   
   >   
   >Could someone tell me what the Kurds have done that unite Turkey, Syria,   
   >Iran and Iran against them?   
   Iraq and Iran.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)