cdee2c8a   
   XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: dead@gone.com   
      
   On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 07:56:56 -0700, Kurt Nicklas wrote:   
      
   > On Jun 17, 8:54 am, Zepp  wrote:   
   >> On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:36:28 -0700, Kurt Nicklas wrote:   
   >> > On Jun 15, 11:33 am, Kurt Nicklas  wrote:   
   >> >> I'd like to know how many folks in these groups support the planned   
   >> >> US intervention in the civil war in Syria.   
   >>   
   >> >> Basically, a "Yes" or "No" is sufficient but if you want to provide   
   >> >> a few sentences supporting your opinion, that's fine.   
   >>   
   >> > No. This administration seems to be supporting any situation which   
   >> > will result in Muslim Brotherhood domination of as many countries as   
   >> > possible. It's already happened in Egypt and Libya and it will happen   
   >> > in Syria. The MB is against everything that the West stands for. They   
   >> > should be our enemies.   
   >>   
   >> > Typical for the B. Hussein Obama administration to be supporting   
   >> > them.   
   >>   
   >> So it's your contention that moderate Moslem groups should have no say   
   >> in their own lands.   
   >   
   > I think my contention was pretty clearly stated above, Porky. Maybe you   
   > should go read it?   
      
   Yeah.  Moslem Brotherhood, for the most part, are moderate.  So what's   
   your beef with them?   
   >   
   >> Tell us, Knickers; who do you suppose should?   
   >   
   > Someone who isn't a threat to Israel or the West.   
      
   The biggest threat to Israel and the West is Israel and the West.   
   Perhaps if Israel stopped stealing land and ghettoizing the Palestinians,   
   and America ended its endless interference in the region, you wouldn't   
   need to worry so much about 'terrorists'.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)