XPost: alt.atheism, alt.religion.islam, alt.society.liberalism   
   From: dead@gone.com   
      
   On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 19:34:27 -0400, Kurt Nicklas wrote:   
      
   > In article , dead@gone.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:11:33 -0400, Steve wrote:   
   >>   
   >> > On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:37:15 -0400, Kurt Nicklas    
   >> > wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> >>In article ,   
   >> >>stevencanyon@yahooooo.com says...   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>> On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:29:06 +0000 (UTC), Zepp    
   >> >>> wrote:   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>> >On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 14:17:07 -0400, Freedom Man wrote:   
   >> >>> >   
   >> >>> >> "Kurt Nicklas"  wrote in message   
   >> >>> >> news:MPG.2c3346b3e7ba0c39896c9@reader80.eternal-september.org...   
   >> >>> >>> WHY AREN?T LIBERALS MORE CRITICAL OF ISLAM?   
   >> >>> >>   
   >> >>> >> Because they are intelligent enough to see it is just another   
   >> >>> >> bullshit "religion" that does the human race far more harm than   
   >> >>> >> good!   
   >> >>> >   
   >> >>> >Where Knickers' mock outrage falls apart is where he has to   
   >> >>> >pretend that Christianity offers some sort of improvement over   
   >> >>> >Islam.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>> Well there's always the fact that Christians don't go around   
   >> >>> beheading people and killing their daughters for dating the wrong   
   >> >>> guy.   
   >>   
   >> Read some European history, Knickers.   
   >   
   > I have, Wordsong, and I know it a lot better than you.   
   >   
   >> It's only been a couple of hundred years since Xians stopped burning   
   >> people at the stake,   
   >   
   > Your warped sense of history aside, it's the Moslems who are chopping   
   > off heads these days and you can't even bring yourself to discriminate.   
   >   
   > You're a coward. Just a coward.   
   >   
   >   
   >> and right wing morons have been whining that society is soft on crime   
   >> ever since.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>And that's only for starters.   
   >> >   
   >> > Oh, and crashing airplanes into buildings, too..  Fact is that many   
   >> > Muslims would lop off Wordsong's ugly head just because he's fat,   
   >> > stupid, wears diapers, and drools..   
   >>   
   >> How many people did America murder in Iraq with "shock and awe"   
   >> Knickers?   
   >   
   > At that is morally equivalent in your warped little mind, huh?   
      
   No, it was actually worse.  About 45,000 people died for your television   
   entertainment.   
   >   
   > You're sick, Wordsong.   
   >   
   >>Remember that?  A pretty display to impress the rubes with how   
   >> fucking patriotic they were.  How many died in that little show?   
   >   
   > You tell me and provide cites and proof. Can't do it, can you?   
      
   Sure.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shock_and_awe   
      
   Now, the Oxford Research Group claims only 6,616 civilian deaths from the   
   Shock and Awe bombing of Baghdad.  Others are much higher, but you wanted   
   something that would be difficult to just dismiss as [whatever group you   
   hate this week] propaganda, right?   
      
   Only that's just about three times the death toll from 9/11.  And the   
   people who died in it no more deserved it than the victims in 9/11 did.   
   >   
   > Pathetic. Time for you to run away again like a good little non-citizen.   
      
   I wonder how many Americans cringe when you start waving the flag around?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)