fe7cff15   
   XPost: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: matttelles@sprynet.com   
      
   Kurt Nicklas  wrote in   
   news:9c628d35-f2fa-42f5-86dc-06dbf4121ba2@7g2000yqy.googlegroups.com:   
      
   > On Feb 20, 9:42 pm, Matt  wrote:   
   >> Kurt Nicklas  wrote   
   >> innews:6696a5b7-3994-4164-8b00   
   > -fa79c48bd375@k8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> > On Feb 20, 6:17 pm, Matt  wrote:   
   >> >> RD Sandman  wrote   
   >> >> innews:XnsA16D736B64DBho   
   >> > pew...@216.196.121.131:   
   >>   
   >> >> > Matt  wrote in   
   >> >> >news:kg377t$8kt$1@dont-email.me:   
   >>   
   >> >> >> RD Sandman  wrote in   
   >> >> >>news:XnsA16D4819EC12Ehopewell@216.196.121.131:   
   >>   
   >> >> >>> Matt  wrote in   
   >> >> >>>news:XnsA16CBFCC1AAE4matttellessprynetcom@78.46.70.116:   
   >>   
   >> >> >>>> RD Sandman  wrote in   
   >> >> >>>>news:XnsA16CAC542BDE7hopewell@216.196.121.131:   
   >>   
   >> >> >>>>> "Oglethorpe"  wrote in   
   >> >> >>>>>news:r_mdncktGtcnirnMnZ2dnUVZ_gCdnZ2d@mchsi.com:   
   >>   
   >> >> >>>>>> "Matt"  wrote in message   
   >> >> >>>>>>news:XnsA16BB13437A9Amatttellessprynetcom@78.46.70.116...   
   >>   
   >> >> >>>>>> If someone goes to a surrounding state to avoid the laws in   
   >> >> >>>>>> their   
   >> >> >>>>>>> state of residence, they cannot LEGALLY purchase a firearm   
   >> >> >>>>>>> Th   
   >> > e   
   >> >> >>>>>>> reason a dealer asks for a driver's license photo ID is to   
   >> >> >>>>>>> check   
   >> >> >> if   
   >> >> >>>>>>> the purchaser is a resident of the state. If not, then an   
   >> >> >>>>>>> F   
   >> > FL   
   >> >> >> (by   
   >> >> >>>>>>> federal law) must be involved from the purchaser's home   
   >> >> >>>>>>> state.   
   >> >> >> That   
   >> >> >>>>>>> FFL will run a background check on the purchaser and   
   >> >> >>>>>>> ensure that   
   >> >> >> the   
   >> >> >>>>>>> transaction meets all applicable laws in the state of   
   >> >> >>>>>>> residence.   
   >>   
   >> >> >>>>>> Right. Like Laughner, right?   
   >>   
   >> >> >>>>>> =   
   >>   
   >> >> >>>>>> You can't even spell his name right. So why should we care   
   >> >> >>>>>> what you "think"? Loughner is a left fringer nutcase who   
   >> >> >>>>>> passed the NICS. He shot Giffords because she is a blue   
   >> >> >>>>>> dogh Democrat and isn't left fringer enough to suit him.   
   >>   
   >> >> >>>>> Loughner was apolitical. He was not a member of the left or   
   >> >> >>>>> of the right. Don't be like our local sheriff Dupnik who   
   >> >> >>>>> tried to paint   
   >> >> >> him   
   >> >> >>>>> as a Tea Partier.   
   >>   
   >> >> >>>>> He also passed NICS because he had not been examined by   
   >> >> >>>>> mental   
   >> >> >> health   
   >> >> >>>>> professionals although he had been expelled from the Pima   
   >> >> >>>>> College campus for scaring his classmates and other   
   >> >> >>>>> infractions (none involving a gun). His parents did nothing   
   >> >> >>>>> about the letter they received from the college and neither   
   >> >> >>>>> did the PCSO or TPD although both departments were aware of   
   >> >> >>>>> him from some of his activities.   
   >>   
   >> >> >>>> Which brings up an interesting point, RD. Would you back a   
   >> >> >>>> law which required you to have a mental health examination by   
   >> >> >>>> an independent   
   >> >> >>> group   
   >> >> >>>> before a gun could be sold to you? And to have that exam   
   >> >> >>>> repeated on some reasonable basis?   
   >>   
   >> >> >>> Nope. I already back laws that allow you to be involuntarily   
   >> >> >> committed   
   >> >> >>> for observation *IF* you display outward signs of mental   
   >> >> >>> impairment. Loughner, Holmes, Cho and Lanza all did.   
   >>   
   >> >> >> And yet, one of the biggest problems is that most do NOT   
   >> >> >> display any sort of outward sign. Or, if you prefer, you cannot   
   >> >> >> always judge a book by its cover.   
   >>   
   >> >> >> Loughner, et al, already committed their crimes. How many more   
   >> >> >> folk out there are going to?   
   >>   
   >> >> > Loughner displayed many signs of mental imbalance BEFORE he went   
   >> >> > off. As did Cho and Lanza. I assume Holmes did also since he was   
   >> >> > being seen by a shrink.   
   >>   
   >> >> Loughner did. But, really, RD, how many times do you read "He was   
   >> >> such a nice young man, never did anyone any harm?" just before   
   >> >> they go off?   
   >>   
   >> >> I don't think a mental exam is in any way infringement, and will   
   >> >> likely catch a lot of these nutcases that slip through   
   >> >> "loopholes".   
   >>   
   >> > It didn't catch leftwing Usenet crusader Steve Kangas before he set   
   >> > off with a pistol to   
   >> > murder Richard Scaife.   
   >>   
   >> And the blathering Snickers continues to make a fool of himself.   
   >   
   > Check out today's post about the hypocrite Useneter Kangas, Bubkis.   
      
   The conservative that killed himself? Why?   
      
   Snickers, I was here then. I know your idiotic arguments. They are as   
   stupid now as they were then.   
      
      
   Poor Snickers. All this time and he hasn't learned a thing.   
      
   Matt   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)