643338ca   
   XPost: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: matttelles@sprynet.com   
      
   Kurt Nicklas  wrote in   
   news:7f5bd3fe-2acc-4a99-ba93-c4c360f99b66@5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com:   
      
   > On Feb 21, 8:14 pm, Matt  wrote:   
   >> Kurt Nicklas  wrote   
   >> innews:9c628d35-f2fa-42f5-86dc   
   > -06dbf4121ba2@7g2000yqy.googlegroups.com:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> > On Feb 20, 9:42 pm, Matt  wrote:   
   >> >> Kurt Nicklas  wrote   
   >> >> innews:6696a5b7-3994-4164-8b00   
   >> > -fa79c48bd...@k8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com:   
   >>   
   >> >> > On Feb 20, 6:17 pm, Matt  wrote:   
   >> >> >> RD Sandman  wrote   
   >> >> >> innews:XnsA16D736B64DBho   
   >> >> > pew...@216.196.121.131:   
   >>   
   >> >> >> > Matt  wrote in   
   >> >> >> >news:kg377t$8kt$1@dont-email.me:   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >> RD Sandman  wrote in   
   >> >> >> >>news:XnsA16D4819EC12Ehopewell@216.196.121.131:   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >>> Matt  wrote in   
   >> >> >> >>>news:XnsA16CBFCC1AAE4matttellessprynetcom@78.46.70.116:   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >>>> RD Sandman  wrote in   
   >> >> >> >>>>news:XnsA16CAC542BDE7hopewell@216.196.121.131:   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >>>>> "Oglethorpe"  wrote in   
   >> >> >> >>>>>news:r_mdncktGtcnirnMnZ2dnUVZ_gCdnZ2d@mchsi.com:   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >>>>>> "Matt"  wrote in message   
   >> >> >> >>>>>>news:XnsA16BB13437A9Amatttellessprynetcom@78.46.70.116...   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >>>>>> If someone goes to a surrounding state to avoid the laws   
   >> >> >> >>>>>> in their   
   >> >> >> >>>>>>> state of residence, they cannot LEGALLY purchase a   
   >> >> >> >>>>>>> firearm Th   
   >> >> > e   
   >> >> >> >>>>>>> reason a dealer asks for a driver's license photo ID is   
   >> >> >> >>>>>>> to check   
   >> >> >> >> if   
   >> >> >> >>>>>>> the purchaser is a resident of the state. If not, then   
   >> >> >> >>>>>>> an F   
   >> >> > FL   
   >> >> >> >> (by   
   >> >> >> >>>>>>> federal law) must be involved from the purchaser's home   
   >> >> >> >>>>>>> state.   
   >> >> >> >> That   
   >> >> >> >>>>>>> FFL will run a background check on the purchaser and   
   >> >> >> >>>>>>> ensure that   
   >> >> >> >> the   
   >> >> >> >>>>>>> transaction meets all applicable laws in the state of   
   >> >> >> >>>>>>> residence.   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >>>>>> Right. Like Laughner, right?   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >>>>>>   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >>>>>> You can't even spell his name right. So why should we   
   >> >> >> >>>>>> care what you "think"? Loughner is a left fringer   
   >> >> >> >>>>>> nutcase who passed the NICS. He shot Giffords because   
   >> >> >> >>>>>> she is a blue dogh Democrat and isn't left fringer   
   >> >> >> >>>>>> enough to suit him.   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >>>>> Loughner was apolitical. He was not a member of the left   
   >> >> >> >>>>> or of the right. Don't be like our local sheriff Dupnik   
   >> >> >> >>>>> who tried to paint   
   >> >> >> >> him   
   >> >> >> >>>>> as a Tea Partier.   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >>>>> He also passed NICS because he had not been examined by   
   >> >> >> >>>>> mental   
   >> >> >> >> health   
   >> >> >> >>>>> professionals although he had been expelled from the Pima   
   >> >> >> >>>>> College campus for scaring his classmates and other   
   >> >> >> >>>>> infractions (none involving a gun). His parents did   
   >> >> >> >>>>> nothing about the letter they received from the college   
   >> >> >> >>>>> and neither did the PCSO or TPD although both departments   
   >> >> >> >>>>> were aware of him from some of his activities.   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >>>> Which brings up an interesting point, RD. Would you back a   
   >> >> >> >>>> law which required you to have a mental health examination   
   >> >> >> >>>> by an independent   
   >> >> >> >>> group   
   >> >> >> >>>> before a gun could be sold to you? And to have that exam   
   >> >> >> >>>> repeated on some reasonable basis?   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >>> Nope. I already back laws that allow you to be   
   >> >> >> >>> involuntarily   
   >> >> >> >> committed   
   >> >> >> >>> for observation *IF* you display outward signs of mental   
   >> >> >> >>> impairment. Loughner, Holmes, Cho and Lanza all did.   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >> And yet, one of the biggest problems is that most do NOT   
   >> >> >> >> display any sort of outward sign. Or, if you prefer, you   
   >> >> >> >> cannot always judge a book by its cover.   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >> Loughner, et al, already committed their crimes. How many   
   >> >> >> >> more folk out there are going to?   
   >>   
   >> >> >> > Loughner displayed many signs of mental imbalance BEFORE he   
   >> >> >> > went off. As did Cho and Lanza. I assume Holmes did also   
   >> >> >> > since he was being seen by a shrink.   
   >>   
   >> >> >> Loughner did. But, really, RD, how many times do you read "He   
   >> >> >> was such a nice young man, never did anyone any harm?" just   
   >> >> >> before they go off?   
   >>   
   >> >> >> I don't think a mental exam is in any way infringement, and   
   >> >> >> will likely catch a lot of these nutcases that slip through   
   >> >> >> "loopholes".   
   >>   
   >> >> > It didn't catch leftwing Usenet crusader Steve Kangas before he   
   >> >> > set off with a pistol to   
   >> >> > murder Richard Scaife.   
   >>   
   >> >> And the blathering Snickers continues to make a fool of himself.   
   >>   
   >> > Check out today's post about the hypocrite Useneter Kangas, Bubkis.   
   >>   
   >> The "progressive" that killed himself? Yea, I remember.   
   >   
   > Ditto, Bubkis.   
      
   You remember being a progressive that killed himself.   
      
   I shall refrain from commentary. Stupidity only needs observation.   
      
   Matt   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)