XPost: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: matttelles@sprynet.com   
      
   "max headroom"  wrote in   
   news:kgjb4k$uf4$2@dont-email.me:   
      
   > Matt  wrote in   
   > news:kgj5bq$p8k$1@dont-email.me:   
   >   
   >> "max headroom"  wrote in   
   >> news:kgimnl$tdi$2@dont-email.me:   
   >   
   >>> Matt  wrote in   
   >>> news:XnsA1733390CA81Bmatttellessprynetcom@78.46.70.116:   
   >   
   >>>> "max headroom"  wrote in   
   >>>> news:kghc08$gof$2@dont-email.me:   
   >   
   >>>>> Matt  wrote in   
   >>>>> news:XnsA172C83D7945Fmatttellessprynetcom@78.46.70.116:   
   >   
   >>>>>> "max headroom"  wrote in   
   >>>>>> news:kgh6le$s4f$3@dont-email.me:   
   >   
   >>>>>>> Democrats are equally guilty of the sins for which you condemn   
   >>>>>>> conservatives.   
   >   
   >>>>>> So, because some Democrats are guilty of some of the sins which   
   >>>>>> make Republicans bad for America, they are equals? Then, surely,   
   >>>>>> it makes no difference who you vote for, and you should vote a   
   >>>>>> straight Democratic ticket.   
   >   
   >>>>> Do you vote a straight ticket? Since that requires almost no   
   >>>>> thought, it would explain much.   
   >   
   >>>> Ah, so now you think you know how I vote too.   
   >   
   >>> Do you see that squiggly mark after the word "ticket"? That's called   
   >>> a "question mark" and it means the sentence asks a question. It is   
   >>> not making a statement.   
   >   
   >> Really. Do you know the word "rhetorical"? Perhaps you should look it   
   >> up. Asking a question and making a statement after it implies a level   
   >> of rhetoric.   
   >   
   > Any inference of rhetoric was purely on your part.   
      
   Then why did you offer the opinion that it explained a lot? Shouldn't   
   you wait until I answer? No, because you've already made up your mind.   
      
   >   
   >>> No need to thank me: elucidating the mysterious to the enfeebled is   
   >>> my burden   
   >   
   >> Thank you. You have shown yourself for what you are. A Conservative   
   >> loser....   
   >   
   > So you believe educators are losers. That's rather harsh... for a   
   > pinkie.   
      
   You educate about as well as, say, George W. Bush decides.   
      
   >   
   >> ... Oops, my bad, I was redundant.   
   >   
   > Wow... if you believe all educators are conservatives, that kinda   
   > places you to the left of Bernie Sanders on the political spectrum.   
      
   Really. Bernie being an independent, you have the most interesting view.   
   That would make your idol a bit to the right. Hitler, perhaps? No,   
   Stalin, I'd think. A shame, you were just a loser before. Now you are a   
   dangerous loser.   
      
   Matt   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)