1bca59f2   
   XPost: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: matttelles@sprynet.com   
      
   Kurt Nicklas  wrote in   
   news:a326b7c2-f361-4933-a61c-b4e9a5af00a2@l9g2000yqp.googlegroups.com:   
      
   > On Feb 26, 5:57 pm, Matt  wrote:   
   >> "max headroom"  wrote   
   >> innews:kgjb4k$uf4$2@dont-   
   > email.me:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> > Matt  wrote in   
   >> >news:kgj5bq$p8k$1@dont-email.me:   
   >>   
   >> >> "max headroom"  wrote in   
   >> >>news:kgimnl$tdi$2@dont-email.me:   
   >>   
   >> >>> Matt  wrote in   
   >> >>>news:XnsA1733390CA81Bmatttellessprynetcom@78.46.70.116:   
   >>   
   >> >>>> "max headroom"  wrote in   
   >> >>>>news:kghc08$gof$2@dont-email.me:   
   >>   
   >> >>>>> Matt  wrote in   
   >> >>>>>news:XnsA172C83D7945Fmatttellessprynetcom@78.46.70.116:   
   >>   
   >> >>>>>> "max headroom"  wrote in   
   >> >>>>>>news:kgh6le$s4f$3@dont-email.me:   
   >>   
   >> >>>>>>> Democrats are equally guilty of the sins for which you   
   >> >>>>>>> condemn conservatives.   
   >>   
   >> >>>>>> So, because some Democrats are guilty of some of the sins   
   >> >>>>>> which make Republicans bad for America, they are equals? Then,   
   >> >>>>>> surely, it makes no difference who you vote for, and you   
   >> >>>>>> should vote a straight Democratic ticket.   
   >>   
   >> >>>>> Do you vote a straight ticket? Since that requires almost no   
   >> >>>>> thought, it would explain much.   
   >>   
   >> >>>> Ah, so now you think you know how I vote too.   
   >>   
   >> >>> Do you see that squiggly mark after the word "ticket"? That's   
   >> >>> called a "question mark" and it means the sentence asks a   
   >> >>> question. It is not making a statement.   
   >>   
   >> >> Really. Do you know the word "rhetorical"? Perhaps you should look   
   >> >> it up. Asking a question and making a statement after it implies a   
   >> >> level of rhetoric.   
   >>   
   >> > Any inference of rhetoric was purely on your part.   
   >>   
   >> Then why did you offer the opinion that it explained a lot? Shouldn't   
   >> you wait until I answer? No, because you've already made up your   
   >> mind.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> >>> No need to thank me: elucidating the mysterious to the enfeebled   
   >> >>> is my burden   
   >>   
   >> >> Thank you. You have shown yourself for what you are. A   
   >> >> Conservative loser....   
   >>   
   >> > So you believe educators are losers. That's rather harsh... for a   
   >> > pinkie.   
   >>   
   >> You educate about as well as, say, George W. Bush decides.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> >> ... Oops, my bad, I was redundant.   
   >>   
   >> > Wow... if you believe all educators are conservatives, that kinda   
   >> > places you to the left of Bernie Sanders on the political spectrum.   
   >>   
   >> Really. Bernie being an independent, you have the most interesting   
   >> view.   
   >   
   > Bernie is a self-described democratic socialist.   
      
   Ooo, lookie, Snickers quotes from the same page.   
      
   And yet, has no idea what he is quoting. I realize that to you,   
   democracy is a horrible thing, Snickers, but fortunately, we don't   
   really care.   
      
      
   Matt   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)