db416e89   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc   
   From: kurtnicklas@gmail.com   
      
   On Mar 10, 7:45 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:   
   > On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 08:47:51 -0500, David Hartung    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   > >>       How do YOU explain the fossil record?   
   >   
   > >I don't. What I do understand is that the information we can gather from   
   > >fossils is limited, and far from definitive. It is highly probable that   
   > >assumptions based upon fossil record can innacurate, incomplete and   
   > >plain wrong. Here is an example:   
   >   
   > Wrong on all counts   
   >   
   > "assumptions based on ..records" are tested by known decay of rare   
   > element over a known, demonstrated, period of time (1/2 life and all   
   > that)   
   >   
   > There is no "incomplete" in the record.   
   >   
   > We know from the accurate record---that some of the descriptionsof   
   > events "in the bible" cannot have taken place at the time suggested by   
   > that record.   
   >   
   > (without creation date as an issue)   
   >   
   > There are scads of descriptions of battles, cities destroyed (in the   
   > bible) that simply do not match the era being attributed as to   
   > happening.   
      
   What are you talking about?   
      
   If there are "scads" then I'm sure you can give even ONE example such   
   a battle, Tin Can?   
      
   Can you do that?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)