XPost: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism   
   From: klausschadenfreude@yahoo.com   
      
   >Don Kresch  wrote in talk.politics.guns :   
      
   >On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 05:10:34 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude   
   > scrawled in blood:   
   >   
   >>>Don Kresch  wrote in talk.politics.guns :   
   >>   
   >>>On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 05:30:49 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude   
   >>> scrawled in blood:   
   >>>   
   >>>>>Don Kresch  wrote in talk.politics.guns :   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:46:41 -0500, "SaPeIsMa"    
   >>>>>scrawled in blood:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>"Don Kresch"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>news:dqfmj8tikm4cc90l6bpg7v04gnu0jm0o0o@4ax.com...   
   >>>>>>> On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 21:20:05 -0500, MarkA    
   >>>>>>> scrawled in blood:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 19:15:49 -0600, Don Kresch wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 10:02:00 -0500, MarkA    
   >>>>>>>>> scrawled in blood:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 02:07:53 +0000, Gray Guest wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> MarkA  wrote in   
   >>>>>>>>>>> news:pan.2013.03.07.15.27.50.820390 @nowhere.invalid:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> No, my original point was that the GOP claims that raising taxes   
   on   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> businesses "kills jobs".   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, stealing money from the private sector to waste on worthless   
   >>>>>>>>>>> liberal   
   >>>>>>>>>>> causes is wasteful.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>Very true.  But, levying fair taxes on businesses and individuals to   
   >>>>>>>>>>provide services that "promote the general welfare" is a worthwhile   
   >>>>>>>>>>investment   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> To whom? And what about that money being better spent on what   
   >>>>>>>>> those people wanted in the first place, rather than having it stolen?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>, and an appropriate role of government.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> There's no such thing.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>Right, because people in large groups naturally take care of each   
   other,   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Yeah, they do.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> You are clueless, Marky. And you have the same dismal view of   
   >>>>>>> humans as the christians do.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Actually, most Christians spend both time and money helping each other.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>	Actually, most christians view humanity as fallen and sinful,   
   >>>>>fit only for hell were it not for the grace of god. This is what I was   
   >>>>>referring to: the dismal view of humans as low.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>One of the reasons why they have been able to create wealth over time..   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Socialists have nothing but a history of squandering and destroying   
   wealth   
   >>>>>>in all of their attempts at imposing their way of doing things.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>	Christianity is socialistic.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Don't ANY of you assholes know what socialism is?   
   >>>   
   >>>	Yes.   
   >>   
   >>Apparently not, if you're stupid enough to think that Christianity has   
   >>anything to do with socialism.   
   >   
   >	And yet there's christian socialism. And there's that whole   
   >"Am I not my brother's keeper?" thing. And the redistribution. It's   
   >socialistic.   
      
   Why don't you go back to the definitions I posted-- which you cut--   
   and actually READ them.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)