XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: dead@gone.com   
      
   On Sun, 12 May 2013 21:08:31 -0700, Jeanne Douglas wrote:   
      
   > In article , Zepp  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Sun, 12 May 2013 19:57:25 -0700, Wayne wrote:   
   >>   
   >> > On Sun, 12 May 2013 07:54:21 -0700 (PDT), Davej    
   >> > wrote:   
   >> >> On May 12, 9:50 am, Kurt Nicklas  wrote:   
   >> >> > [...]   
   >> >> > There's new evidence, obtained by ABC, that the Obama   
   >> > administration   
   >> >> > did deliberately purge references to "terrorism" from accounts of   
   >> > the   
   >> >> > attack on the Benghazi diplomatic mission...   
   >> >   
   >> >   
   >> >   
   >> >   
   >> >> Darrell Issa needs both hands to wipe his own ass. I'm still waiting   
   >> >> for the Republicans to explain why it is so, so, so important to   
   >> > give   
   >> >> terrorists the publicity they crave.   
   >> >   
   >> > The whole thing could be put to bed if Obama/Clinton would just fess   
   >> > up.   
   >>   
   >> Ah, the old "if they weren't guilty of something, why would we be   
   >> accusing them?"   
   >   
   > These Republican assholes are obsessing over the process for how talking   
   > points are created. They go back and forth and everybody puts their 2   
   > cents in and, eventually, the final version is produced. NOTHING before   
   > that means a damned thing; it was just the point of the view of the   
   > first people to start the ball rolling.   
      
   I bet that with the exception of Mittens, who just shot from the hip and   
   lost several toes, the GOP went through a similar process trying to   
   figure out how to exploit Benghazi.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)