XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns
From: dead@gone.com
On Mon, 13 May 2013 11:51:09 -0500, Dänk 42Ø wrote:
> On Mon, 13 May 2013 11:56:11 -0400, Steve wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 13 May 2013 15:21:27 +0000 (UTC), Zepp wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 12 May 2013 21:08:31 -0700, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article , Zepp wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 12 May 2013 19:57:25 -0700, Wayne wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > On Sun, 12 May 2013 07:54:21 -0700 (PDT), Davej
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> >> On May 12, 9:50 am, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
>>>>> >> > [...]
>>>>> >> > There's new evidence, obtained by ABC, that the Obama
>>>>> > administration
>>>>> >> > did deliberately purge references to "terrorism" from accounts
>>>>> >> > of
>>>>> > the
>>>>> >> > attack on the Benghazi diplomatic mission...
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> Darrell Issa needs both hands to wipe his own ass. I'm still
>>>>> >> waiting for the Republicans to explain why it is so, so, so
>>>>> >> important to
>>>>> > give
>>>>> >> terrorists the publicity they crave.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The whole thing could be put to bed if Obama/Clinton would just
>>>>> > fess up.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ah, the old "if they weren't guilty of something, why would we be
>>>>> accusing them?"
>>>>
>>>> These Republican assholes are obsessing over the process for how
>>>> talking points are created. They go back and forth and everybody puts
>>>> their 2 cents in and, eventually, the final version is produced.
>>>> NOTHING before that means a damned thing; it was just the point of
>>>> the view of the first people to start the ball rolling.
>>>
>>>I bet that with the exception of Mittens, who just shot from the hip
>>>and lost several toes, the GOP went through a similar process trying to
>>>figure out how to exploit Benghazi.
>>
>> Benghazi-gate..
>
> Browsing through the latest tardation posted to this newsgroup, I hear
> Mitt Romney's name being quacked over and over and over by leftards.
> Checking again, it appears that he still lost the Nov. 6, 2012 election,
> and he presently holds no political office. In other words, Romney is
> completely irrelevant, yet leftards invoke his name in response to any
> criticism of Chairman Obama.
One of the main reasons he lost was because he tried to make a political
football out of Benghazi.
Especially the second debate, when he was silly enough to believe you
crazy right wing fucks and tried claiming Obama never referred to
'terrorism' in the wake of the attacks.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
