XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: dead@gone.com   
      
   On Mon, 13 May 2013 10:21:15 -0600, deep wrote:   
      
   > On Mon, 13 May 2013 15:22:29 +0000 (UTC), Zepp  wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Sun, 12 May 2013 22:30:33 -0700, Jason wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> In article , RD Sandman   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> Jeanne Douglas  wrote in   
   >>>> news:hlwdjsd2-3FE0AA.21083112052013@news.giganews.com:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> > In article , Zepp    
   >>>> > wrote:   
   >>>> >   
   >>>> >> On Sun, 12 May 2013 19:57:25 -0700, Wayne wrote:   
   >>>> >>   
   >>>> >> > On Sun, 12 May 2013 07:54:21 -0700 (PDT), Davej   
   >>>> >> >  wrote:   
   >>>> >> >> On May 12, 9:50 am, Kurt Nicklas  wrote:   
   >>>> >> >> > [...]   
   >>>> >> >> > There's new evidence, obtained by ABC, that the Obama   
   >>>> >> > administration   
   >>>> >> >> > did deliberately purge references to "terrorism" from   
   >>>> >> >> > accounts of   
   >>>> >> > the   
   >>>> >> >> > attack on the Benghazi diplomatic mission...   
   >>>> >> >   
   >>>> >> >   
   >>>> >> >   
   >>>> >> >   
   >>>> >> >> Darrell Issa needs both hands to wipe his own ass. I'm still   
   >>>> >> >> waiting for the Republicans to explain why it is so, so, so   
   >>>> >> >> important to   
   >>>> >> > give   
   >>>> >> >> terrorists the publicity they crave.   
   >>>> >> >   
   >>>> >> > The whole thing could be put to bed if Obama/Clinton would just   
   >>>> >> > fess up.   
   >>>> >>   
   >>>> >> Ah, the old "if they weren't guilty of something, why would we be   
   >>>> >> accusing them?"   
   >>>> >   
   >>>> > These Republican assholes are obsessing over the process for how   
   >>>> > talking points are created.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> No, most of the problems are the lies about who created what.  Big   
   >>>> difference between what Hillary and the White House claim they did   
   >>>> and what the CIA and FBI claim they did.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>  They go back and forth and everybody puts   
   >>>> > their 2 cents in and, eventually, the final version is produced.   
   >>>> > NOTHING before that means a damned thing; it was just the point of   
   >>>> > the view of the first people to start the ball rolling.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Do you honestly believe that it took them a week to realize that   
   >>>> video didn't have a damn thing to do with it?   
   >>>   
   >>> They knew they were lying. They just wanted to make it past the   
   >>> election before revealing the truth.   
   >>>   
   >>> They had a chance to talk to the survivors the week after the attack   
   >>> so they knew the truth--that it was a well planned terrorist attack.   
   >>   
   >>And said so within hours of the attack.   
   >>   
   >>What is WRONG with you people?   
   >   
   > Obama is supposed to be clairvoyant, all-seeing.  Has to be able to know   
   > about any disaster in advance.   
   >   
   > Just another case of Republicans trying to destroy a good President   
   > simply because he's a Democrat and because they can't win on the issues.   
      
   Yeah, and it's gone way beyond old. I note that Obama's poll ratings are   
   rock stead, the GOP Congression ratings are down 33% from their already   
   absymally low March ratings.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)