XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   "deep" wrote in message news:rfg2p85d0op3t1knln4conjjsdncn6bq9g@4ax.com...   
   > On Mon, 13 May 2013 14:15:56 -0500, RD Sandman   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >>deep wrote in news:nfa2p8diimermp4kcg1pv6prbqrso51udh@4ax.com:   
   >>   
   >>> On Mon, 13 May 2013 12:15:57 -0500, RD Sandman   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>deep wrote in news:dbo1p8dvo2pkvfpgef5a3cl6tm8v48t92u@4ax.com:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Sun, 12 May 2013 22:30:33 -0700, Jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>They had a chance to talk to the survivors the week after the attack   
   >>so   
   >>>>>>they knew the truth--that it was a well planned terrorist attack.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Which nobody knew until much later.  The Administration wasn't hiding   
   >>>>> anything.  At the time nobody knew what was going on.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Bullshit.  They sure as hell knew the following morning.   
   >>>   
   >>> Prove it.   
   >>   
   >>Watch the hearings, dumbass.   
   >>   
   >>  They had no good intel on the ground.  They had no warning,   
   >>> nobody claiming responsiblity.  Contradictory reports from on site. It   
   >>> wasn't until days later all the facts came out and even then they   
   >>> weren't completely sure of what the truth was.  There was no deceit or   
   >>> deception.  Only a breakdown of intel and communications in a very   
   >>> difficult time.   
   >>   
   >>Must be why all the aliterations on the reports while the Administration   
   >>claims only one change and it was purely 'sylistic'.  ;)   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>Once again this is nothing but a bunch of Republicans   
   >>> monkeys flinging feces hoping some will stick to Obama.   
   >>   
   >>Apparently some of that stuck to you since you seem to be full of shit   
   >>again.   
   >   
   > They have no proof.   
      
   (Reuters) - Officials at the White House and State Department were advised   
   two hours after attackers assaulted the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi,   
   Libya, on September 11 that an Islamic militant group had claimed credit for   
   the attack, official emails show.   
      
   http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/24/us-usa-benghazi-emails   
   idUSBRE89N02C20121024   
      
   What do you call that?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)