XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   "deep" wrote in message news:vjg2p8lf7u9tu0l6egaqms76l9ha97d3rn@4ax.com...   
   > On Mon, 13 May 2013 18:13:27 +0000 (UTC), Bert    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>In news:dbo1p8dvo2pkvfpgef5a3cl6tm8v48t92u@4ax.com deep wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Sun, 12 May 2013 22:30:33 -0700, Jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>They had a chance to talk to the survivors the week after the attack   
   >>>>so they knew the truth--that it was a well planned terrorist attack.   
   >>>   
   >>> Which nobody knew until much later.  The Administration wasn't hiding   
   >>> anything.  At the time nobody knew what was going on.   
   >>   
   >>Which explains the almost immediate and continuing claim that the   
   >>attack was actually a "spontaneous demonstration" against a movie that   
   >>no one had seen.   
   >   
   > Actually lots of people had seen it and at the time that was the best   
   > intel they had.  Nobody had any reason to conclude it was a planned   
   > terrorist attack of such magnitude.   
      
   Right, they just happened to show up with RPGs and mortars to a   
   demonstration over a YouTube video?   
      
   >  Terrorists usually don't make   
   > major frontal assaults on US property.  There was no reason to think   
   > it was.   
      
   (Reuters) - Officials at the White House and State Department were advised   
   two hours after attackers assaulted the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi,   
   Libya, on September 11 that an Islamic militant group had claimed credit for   
   the attack, official emails show.   
      
   http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/24/us-usa-benghazi-emails   
   idUSBRE89N02C20121024   
      
   There was every reason to think so. The armaments for one. The claims of   
   responsibility for another.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)