XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   "Zepp"  wrote in message news:kms9v5$s25$17@dont-email.me...   
   > On Mon, 13 May 2013 21:53:34 -0500, RD Sandman wrote:   
   >   
   >> Tom McDonald  wrote in news:83gkt.352$je4.172   
   >> @newsfe09.iad:   
   >>   
   >>> On 5/13/2013 7:45 PM, RD Sandman wrote:   
   >>>> deep wrote in news:rfg2p85d0op3t1knln4conjjsdncn6bq9g@4ax.com:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Mon, 13 May 2013 14:15:56 -0500, RD Sandman   
   >>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> deep wrote in news:nfa2p8diimermp4kcg1pv6prbqrso51udh@4ax.com:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On Mon, 13 May 2013 12:15:57 -0500, RD Sandman   
   >>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> deep wrote in news:dbo1p8dvo2pkvfpgef5a3cl6tm8v48t92u@4ax.com:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 12 May 2013 22:30:33 -0700, Jason@nospam.com (Jason)   
   >> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> They had a chance to talk to the survivors the week after the   
   >>>> attack   
   >>>>>> so   
   >>>>>>>>>> they knew the truth--that it was a well planned terrorist   
   >> attack.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Which nobody knew until much later.  The Administration wasn't   
   >>>> hiding   
   >>>>>>>>> anything.  At the time nobody knew what was going on.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Bullshit.  They sure as hell knew the following morning.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Prove it.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Watch the hearings, dumbass.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   They had no good intel on the ground.  They had no warning,   
   >>>>>>> nobody claiming responsiblity.  Contradictory reports from on site.   
   >>>> It   
   >>>>>>> wasn't until days later all the facts came out and even then they   
   >>>>>>> weren't completely sure of what the truth was.  There was no deceit   
   >>>> or   
   >>>>>>> deception.  Only a breakdown of intel and communications in a very   
   >>>>>>> difficult time.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Must be why all the aliterations on the reports while the   
   >>>> Administration   
   >>>>>> claims only one change and it was purely 'sylistic'.  ;)   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Once again this is nothing but a bunch of Republicans   
   >>>>>>> monkeys flinging feces hoping some will stick to Obama.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Apparently some of that stuck to you since you seem to be full of   
   >> shit   
   >>>>>> again.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> They have no proof.  Just Obama haters' opinions.  Another Republican   
   >>>>> witchhunt, and they are dragging out anybody they can find who will   
   >>>>> try to blame everything on Obama.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Sounds just like you guys on Bush.   
   >>>>   
   >>> Well, except, of course, Bush actually did most of the stuff we blamed   
   >>> on him. Hell, lots of it, he was (and is) proud of.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Actually, no, he didn't.  He did not falsify intel although he may have   
   >> misread it.   
   >   
   > What about the claims that they knew exactly what WMDS Saddam possessed   
   > and where they were located a few days before the war?  Obviously they   
   > were lying then.   
      
      
   Oh, so as long as there are "claims" then naturally they HAD to be lying...   
      
   And then you wonder why people don't consider your claims creditable.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)