XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: dead@gone.com   
      
   On Tue, 14 May 2013 10:15:31 -0500, RD Sandman wrote:   
      
   > Zepp  wrote in news:kms9fk$s25$16@dont-email.me:   
   >   
   >> On Mon, 13 May 2013 21:55:03 -0500, RD Sandman wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Zepp  wrote in news:kms653$s25$11@dont-email.me:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Mon, 13 May 2013 18:48:35 -0800, linuxgal wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> deep wrote:   
   >>>>>> Somebody working for Obama make a bad error in judgement an you   
   > want   
   >>> to   
   >>>>>> crucify Obama for FOUR American deaths.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> No, I want to crucify Obama for covering up an al-Qaeda attack by   
   >>>>> running a narrative it was just a protest in response to a YouTube   
   >>> video   
   >>>>> because it was the eve of the election and he was running as the guy   
   >>> who   
   >>>>> killed bin Laden.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I'm sure you want to crucify him, but it's pretty hard to claim a   
   > cover   
   >>>> up when the NEXT DAY he's talking about it being an act of terror.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>> No, he didn't.  He was talking about terror in general.  Listen   
   >>> carefully to that video of him in the Rose Garden.   
   >>   
   >> Given that nobody knew exactly who was behind the attacks, how specific   
   >> could he get?   
   >>   
   >>   
   > You missed the point.  His comment about terror attacks was about them   
   > in general, not Benghazi.  A week later he was still claiming that   
   > Benghazi was the result of the video.   
      
   He was talking about Benghazi.  Unless there were some OTHER attacks of   
   which we are unaware...?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)