XPost: alt.fan.unabomber, alt.fan.jane-krankowski, alt.support.boy-lovers
XPost: alt.fan.marcia-clark
From: 4s00th@thetruth.com
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 23:24:12 -0700, tariq.1.rahim@spamgourmet.com
wrote:
>On Jun 27, 8:22 am, bobandcarole wrote:
>> On Jun 27, 8:13?am, tariq.1.ra...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
>>
>x-no-archive: yes
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>> Ya STILL can't get that right...LOL
>>
>>
>>
>> > I'm struck by how many readers seem to believe that the Gospels
>> > mandate an expansive welfare state. I can't see it myself. Jesus was
>> > admant about eschewing politics; and his injunction to help the poor
>> > was
>>
>> If ya wanna write a book, find a publisher moron.......
>
>it is someone else's web page. The writer of that page probably
>favors the execution of pedophiles, as all right thinking adults do.
Another fine person who does not understand the difference between a
pedophile and a child-molester.
I understand the difference between fantasies and actions -- and
choose not to act out those fantasies against a defenseless child;
you, on the other hand, seem to think it's alright to judge a person
upon what they think and then to execute them if you don't like it.
Are you so willing to let the thought police into your head when your
own call for violence against people who have committed no crime other
than thinking about things that they cannot and will not do marks you
as a perfect target for those same thought police? Or do you not
understand the difference between thoughts and actions?
What's worse -- a person who thinks about breaking a law and possibly
harming someone, or someone who thinks it's okay to kill them just for
those thoughts?
4s00th
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
