Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.blade-runner    |    Pretty decent scifi 80's flick    |    22,770 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 20,862 of 22,770    |
|    StainlessSteelRat to Ned Ludd    |
|    Re: [OT] Windows swap file - any tips?    |
|    01 Feb 08 08:49:45    |
      From: usenet@stainlesssteelrat.net              Ned Ludd wrote:       >>> Get more RAM is the best solution :) Idealy, have it on a seperate       >>> partition       >>       >> I used to do this, but as it was on the same disk and the size was       >> fixed I twigged it was pointless.       >       > Not entirely: if the swap file is the only thing on the partition, it       > can't get intertwined with other files.              If you defrag a fixed file though it isn't going to get intertwined. Or if       you can't defrag it just set it to zero, defrag, then resize.              >>> or even better, seperate hard disk to stop is getting       >>> fragmented, and yes keep it a fixed size       >>       >> The latter negates the former. But to keep it on a separate little       >> used/archive disk is another idea - something I've done in the past.       >       > This would also work, but I don't think there would be a big gain.              Hard to say, and as Alfie says he got a gain. It's also relative, as some       people will go to the ends of the Earth to get a minor performance gain.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca