From: lukas.mariman@REMOVETHISdommel.be   
      
   Eberhard Schefold wrote:   
   > Sentinel wrote:   
   >   
   >> I can understand how people feel the issue should have been left   
   >> ambiguous, but it really is not. *That* is what the unicorn is   
   >> about; *that* is why we see Deckard with the Glowing Eyes.   
   >>   
   >> This is not a matter of "opinion" as some like to pretend it is.   
   >> Also, saying Scott doesn't have the final word in this matter is   
   >> IMHO utterly silly.   
   >   
   > I herewith state for the record that I disagree, but that I'm too lazy   
   > to reiterate all those discussions for one more round (at least for   
   > the time being).   
   >   
   > What I find a little alarming this time is when people are not even   
   > being entitled to their own opinion on how to interpret a movie.   
   > That's a bit thick.   
      
   Putting it bluntly, there's simply nothing to be interpreted here.   
      
   That is my POV on the matter.   
   You're welcome to disagree, as always. :-)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)