From: lukas.mariman@REMOVETHISdommel.be   
      
   Gnomus wrote:   
   > In article , Netrunner   
   >  wrote:   
   > ... [snipped]   
   > Net, I have to agree with your take re:  interpretation.  If I want to   
   > think of Deckard as an evil tooth fairy (hey -- an early opening scene   
   > had him ripping the jaw out of a rep!), then I'll do it.  Every viewer   
   > has to make sense out of the movies they watch.  Every movie has   
   > slang, foreign words, etc., that may not be familiar to all people.   
   > Not everyone is going to interpret visual symbols in the same way.   
   >   
   > Sentinel, Scott is free to explain his intentions if he wants to, but   
   > the viewer is under no obligation to take his intentions into   
   > consideration.   
      
   You know, I get a kick out of people addressing me as "Sentinel". There's   
   something cool about that! :-)   
      
   Anyway, as always we'll have to agree to disagree. My POV regarding   
   deck-a-rep remains what it always was, really.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)