From: lukas.mariman@REMOVETHISdommel.be   
      
   Eberhard Schefold wrote:   
   > Sentinel wrote:   
   >   
   >> Putting it bluntly, there's simply nothing to be interpreted here.   
   >   
   > That’s absurd. Even if you believe that it’s the /only possible/   
   > interpretation, it’s still an interpretation.   
      
   Don't take this too personal, Eberhard, but this being a discussion forum...   
   will you people stop this interpretation nonsense? We KNOW perfectly what   
   the unicorn stands for. We KNOW exactly what is up with the Glowing Eyes   
   (tm). We know *intimately* what Ridey Scott intended at this point. Why are   
   you going on about "interpreting"? There is nothing to interpret.   
      
   > Really, these are two fundamentally different things: Discussing   
   > opinions, or discussing whether there can be different opinions. I   
   > respect your opinion, but I can’t take you serious if you claim that   
   > there can’t be different opinions. A single dissenting opinion proves   
   > you wrong.   
      
   Interpretations and opinions are OK but they mean nothing if you know the   
   facts. We regulars do know the facts - almost as well as those who made the   
   samn movie. What is left to interpret?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)