From: lukas.mariman@REMOVETHISdommel.be
Replicant wrote:
> "Sentinel" wrote in message
> news:60j938F1qql6jU1@mid.individual.net...
>> Gnomus wrote:
>>> In article , Netrunner
>>> wrote:
>>> ... [snipped]
>>> Net, I have to agree with your take re: interpretation. If I want
>>> to think of Deckard as an evil tooth fairy (hey -- an early opening
>>> scene had him ripping the jaw out of a rep!), then I'll do it. Every
>>> viewer has to make sense out of the movies they watch. Every
>>> movie has slang, foreign words, etc., that may not be familiar to
>>> all people. Not everyone is going to interpret visual symbols in
>>> the same way. Sentinel, Scott is free to explain his intentions if he
>>> wants to,
>>> but the viewer is under no obligation to take his intentions into
>>> consideration.
>>
>> You know, I get a kick out of people addressing me as "Sentinel".
>> There's something cool about that! :-)
>>
>> Anyway, as always we'll have to agree to disagree. My POV regarding
>> deck-a-rep remains what it always was, really.
>
> Well that's the beauty of this film....everyone can take something
> different away from it and something new everytime they watch it!
> I guess my view is kinda mid-way; it appeals to me that Deckard could
> be a rep (Nexus 7?) and there are the visual cues to back this up
> (the glowing eyes, the photo collection, the unicorn vision coupled
> with Gaffs unicorn) but I also find the notion of him experiencing
> emotions for something (someone) artificial utterly
> enthralling...loving a Replicant, the ultimate taboo for the Blade
> Runner! Bizzare I know but that's what I take away from and kep
> coming back for. Hope I haven't offended anyone ha ha!
Not at all! Discussion about BR is what this newsgroup is there for! By all
means, stick around and post away, friend!
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
