From: lukas.mariman@REMOVETHISdommel.be   
      
   Eberhard Schefold wrote:   
   > Sentinel wrote:   
   >   
   >> Don't take this too personal, Eberhard, but this being a discussion   
   >> forum... will you people stop this interpretation nonsense? We KNOW   
   >> perfectly what the unicorn stands for. We KNOW exactly what is up   
   >> with the Glowing Eyes (tm). We know *intimately* what Ridey Scott   
   >> intended at this point. Why are you going on about "interpreting"?   
   >> There is nothing to interpret.   
   >   
   > Seeing the same object twice in different contexts and making a   
   > connection is ever an interpretation. It may be an obvious one to you,   
   > but it is an interpretation. This is not a fact, and what's more, what   
   > Scott /intended/ at this point is completely irrelevant.   
      
   I disagree completely, but I guess you got that part...   
      
   > And no, I won't take this personal, but I won't stop, either.   
      
   Good. I won't either! :-)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)