Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.blade-runner    |    Pretty decent scifi 80's flick    |    22,770 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 20,993 of 22,770    |
|    Luke Hooft to Ned Ludd    |
|    Re: [OT] Toshiba climbs on 'HD DVD exit'    |
|    19 Feb 08 23:17:37    |
      From: blank@nothing.com              Ned Ludd wrote:              > Oh, I don't know.       >       > The cinema standards are given in vertical lines of resolution, while TV       > standards are horizontal.       >       > SDTV is generally considered 720x480, while typical widescreen HD       > monitors are 1920x1080.       >       > In other words, we're very close to 2K now with a good widescreen TV.       >       > So 4K is only twice the resolution, four times the number of pixels per       > frame.       >       > Doesn't seem a stretch.              Yeah - maybe not for physical panels (1080p looks amazing on a 60 inch       plasma or lcd but 4 times the resolution just wouldn't be noticable at       the distances you're viewing at), but I could see 4k being viable in       homes with projectors - and of course a 4k projector will eventually be       as affordable as a 1080p one is today.              LH              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca