From: team8martinland@hotmail.com   
      
   On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:31:02 +0100, Gnomus  wrote:   
      
   > In article , Martin Schemitsch   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 06:49:02 +0100, Gnomus    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >> > In article , Alric   
   >> > Knebel  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> > The other thing, if I remember correctly, is the number of "skinjobs"   
   >> > on the loose is actually consistent and correct.  So they went from   
   >> > having it right to screwing it all up.   
   >> >   
   >> >> And about that workprint, today was the first time I'd seen it.   
   >> >> Interesting.  Not really a noticeable difference, except for the >>   
   >> music and the ending.   
   >> >   
   >> > There are actually a lot of little details that differ from the other   
   >> > versions, like when Deckard is looking at Leon's photos in the Esper   
   >> > and sees Roy, he says "Hello, Roy."  I didn't register them all the   
   >> > first time I saw it.   
   >>   
   >> One thing Paul M. Sammon didn't mention, which I found very obvious   
   >> when I   
   >> finally saw (and heard) the work print for the first time:   
   >>   
   >> During the whole length of the snake pit scene, there's sexual panting   
   >> (presumably from the stage?) "hot" (both meanings!) on the soundtrack.   
   >> ;)   
   >>   
   >> Have a better one,   
   >> Martin   
      
   > Yeah, I didn't notice that (or at least I don't recall noticing it)   
   > while seeing it at the NuArt.   
      
   Cool, you WERE THERE? Lucky you! 8-D   
      
   > But it struck me this time.  It's   
   > strange!   
      
   You know: The work print is something you have to watch over and over to   
   appreciate the subtle differences. Sounds familiar? ;-)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)