From: darth.vader@empire.gov   
      
   "Gnomus"  schreef in bericht   
   news:210320081500167919%gnomus@yukonhotel.net...   
   > In article <64gv63F2c6auuU1@mid.individual.net>,  wrote:   
   >   
   >> Sentinel wrote:   
   >> > Why can't we all just... get along?   
   >> >   
   >> > ...   
   >> > Waitaminit, what am I saying? This is deck-a-rep!   
   >> >   
   >> > DIE, DIE, DIE!!!!   
   >> >   
   >> > ;-p   
   >> >   
   >> >   
   >>   
   >> Can't understand why everyone is so puzzled about that.  Scott says   
   >> firmly, in one of his interviews, that there were many things pointing   
   >> to the fact that Deckard was a replicant.  He mentions the unicorn dream   
   >> and the origami unicorn link, saying that Gaff must have seen what was   
   >> in Deckard's files.  Then, Scott says words to the effect that anyone   
   >> who doubts that Deckard is a replicant is a bloody fool.   
   >   
   > Some of us prefer the original theatrical cut, which is much more   
   > ambiguous about all that.  And besides, Ridley Scott can go fuck   
   > himself.   
      
   Whoah, that's a bit too much now, isn't it? Aren't you supposed to be a   
   longtime BR fan?   
      
   Also, people, this thread was actually an attempt to lighten things up.   
      
   No, REALLY.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)