From: darth.vader@empire.gov
"Sentinel" schreef in bericht
news:64l7odF2cba8dU1@mid.individual.net...
>
> "Sentinel" schreef in bericht
> news:64l7baF2bv9esU1@mid.individual.net...
>>
>> "SanFrancisco2019" schreef in bericht
>> news:zndFj.23426$Ej5.1499@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
>>> "Sentinel" wrote in message
>>> news:64itt6F284jqkU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>
>>>> Are you quite sure you "got" the "humane" message of this movie?
>>>> Doesn't if seem strange you have to distance yourself from its director
>>>> to really feel you are comfortable with it?
>>>>
>>>> Once more, Blade Runner is the movie it is BECAUSE of Ridley Scott.
>>>> Without him does anyone think we would even be here discussing some
>>>> 26-year-old movie?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I don't wish to be insulting, but you must have a yard of guts to
>>> question whether I, or any other regular, trusted poster to this group,
>>> "gets" what Blade Runner is, at it's core, all about. [...]
>>
>> I never insult people unless they really have it coming. But remember
>> that this IS a discussion forum, and that whatever you or anyone post
>> can/may/will be dissected by anyone else.
>>
>> You wrote about the supposed "humane message" of the film. I was merely
>> addressing that with my follow-up post. *Is* there even a humane message
>> here? And even if so, does Deckard being a replicant himself have any
>> impact on that?
>
> Expanding on that, knowing that Scott fully intended for Deckard to be a
> replicant, are you sure a humane message is really what the movie is
> about? Etc etc.
Then again (arguing with myself here, sorry 'bout that) does it actually
MATTER if Deck's a rep for the movie to have a valid humane message or not?
Wasn't the movie pointing out how HUMAN the reps really were?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
