From: darth.vader@empire.gov
"SanFrancisco2019" schreef in bericht
news:zndFj.23426$Ej5.1499@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
> "Sentinel" wrote in message
> news:64itt6F284jqkU1@mid.individual.net...
>>
>> Are you quite sure you "got" the "humane" message of this movie? Doesn't
>> if seem strange you have to distance yourself from its director to really
>> feel you are comfortable with it?
>>
>> Once more, Blade Runner is the movie it is BECAUSE of Ridley Scott.
>> Without him does anyone think we would even be here discussing some
>> 26-year-old movie?
>>
>>
>>
> I don't wish to be insulting, but you must have a yard of guts to
> question whether I, or any other regular, trusted poster to this group,
> "gets" what Blade Runner is, at it's core, all about. This quibble over
> the actual genetic structure of the film's hero is an entertaining little
> distracter task, nothing more. I read the posts and occasionally chime in
> on this issue because I, mostly, like how folks represent themselves here,
> and it keeps me in this loop.
>
> Very rarely, however, someone, usually a kook, looney teenager or
> telemarketing type, will post something here that really turns me off.
> Well, what you wrote in your first paragraph above REALLY turned me off.
> I have no idea what that's worth to you, or to the group. Perhaps this is
> an oversensitivity problem on my end.
OK, here's one more, Dan, George, Bill, anyone else... This one's been
bugging me a wee bit.
People such as you get annoyed when deck-a-reppers speak their mind (as is
their absolute right) but at the same time anti-DAR people are going "Scott
can go fuck himself!"
Once again, don't take this personally, but really, people, don't complain
to US about any "sensitivity" issues.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
