Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.blade-runner    |    Pretty decent scifi 80's flick    |    22,770 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 21,438 of 22,770    |
|    Netrunner to All    |
|    Re: More about this part of the movie (R    |
|    11 Jun 08 14:20:31    |
      From: e-mail.me@from.BRmovie.com              Standing in the dark, rainy shadows of a city alleyway, I spied the       Replicant Gnomus covertly transmitting a message to renegade friends       in alt.fan.blade-runner. Tracking...                     >snip!              >I think having Rachel living in the building and never having gone       >outside is a bit a stretch, Net.              Perhaps, but I think worth considering.              > Although the idea of implanted       >memories does cover one potential problem: when Deckard invites her to       >Taffey Lewis's place, she says, "That's not my kind of place." She has       >some knowledge of it.              Yes. It doesn't imply a memory of actually being there, but knowledge       of what kind of place it is (and perhaps the whole area). I would       think a relatively simple implant - would make her not want to ever go       to this crowded place where she is less easy to monitor - without an       overriding reason.              >But she's not Tyrell's niece; she only has some of her memories, so       >there's no reason for him to go out of his way to provide for her. Do       >you really think the rest of the proles share the place with the big       >man?              No, she is not his niece, but she is being led to believe she is ...       what exactly? Certainly some special relationship. Also, That       building is absolutely ginormous - there is certainly scope to have       apartments in part of it, shopping, restaurants, etc.              >Also, she doesn't just go off-leash once, but twice. The first right       >after the VK test and subsequent Tyrell's rejection to see her. That       >one doesn't seem to trigger any alarms, tighter security, etc.              Ah. But under the scenario presented, it is certainly possible that       the first time, she did not actually go "off-leash" - she might still       have been closely monitored.              >Your explanation for the timing of Rachel leaving and Bryant getting       >word works though, you slippery bugger!              I try.              Netrunner              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca