63688416
From: Frankensnoot@whackerbendies.com
"la2018" wrote in message
news:dc4b74f9-27cc-4b6d-9175-a0f339881f62@w30g2000yqw.googlegroups.com...
> OMG - Raine!
>
> Thank you so very much for answering my questions and sorry for having
> asked a lot of them ;-). I almost can´t believe it! So many years have
> passed by since the first time I heard Vangelis' music, since I had
> first seen Blade Runner. I´m a bit overwhelmed and also delighted by
> now...I mean... what can I say, it is just wonderful to read about
> your experience with Vangelis and the technical aspects of your work.
>
> So in the end, there were no special engeneering tricks used. Just
> pure sound, state of the art analogue technology and Vangelis'
> virtuosity. One thing puzzled me though. You said he detested
> compression of any kind but what about using the UREIs for limiting
> the stereo sum of the Quad Eight? I mean were the UREIs really never
> ever in use? I could imagine that they may have been used as limiters
> to not overdrive the master tape during stereo mixdown. If they were
> really never used at all do you maybe remember which compressor was
> used to tame the dynamic range in the mastering process? I´m just
> guessing here but it´s hard to imagine that absolutely no compression/
> limiting had been used in the final processes prior to vinyl cutting.
>
> Also, do you think that the very special DBX compander noise reduction
> had a significant impact on the overall sound or perceived dynamic
> behaviour of an instrument signal? Or was it just like what you were
> putting in was coming out but without most of the noise ;-) ?
>
> Okay, no more questions from here and I just want to say that I feel
> honoured writing to you. It feels like I´m 14 again and talking to the
> manager of my favourite pop star... :o)
>
> Cheers
> Ken
>
Good questions.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
