From: howddgrhol@yaynnoo.com   
      
   Richard Hershberger  wrote   
      
   > Interesting question.  Assumption of risk is a strong legal defense.   
   > I suppose that it is possible that the proprietors of this fine   
   > establishment represented the cat as being a tame pussy, but I am   
   > guessing not.  Why would any pay $150 to pet a tame cat?  Were I a   
   > betting man, I would put my money on the defense winning.   
      
   Is there a legal doctrine "every leopard gets one mauling?"   
      
   --   
   This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.   
   https://www.avast.com/antivirus   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)