From: 61rroger@gmail.com   
      
   On Thursday, January 28, 2021 at 8:10:43 AM UTC-5, hymie! wrote:   
   > In our last episode, the evil Dr. Lacto had captured our hero,   
   > Roger House <61rr...@gmail.com>, who said:    
   >    
   > > 2.) In relation to number 1, as an example, if your order total comes    
   > > to something like, say, $18.02, when you give me your payment money,    
   > > you do not *NEED* to give me $20.05, twenty even covers it just fine.   
   > Are you seriously suggesting that it's OK for me, as a customer, to    
   > make the asumption "Oh, I don't have enough money to cover my entire    
   > purchase, but I have most of it, and the cashier will accept what I have    
   > and be satisfied" ?    
   >    
   > --hymie! http://nasalinux.net/~hymie hy...@nasalinux.net   
      
   No, I'm not suggesting that at all.  For the sake of this discussion relating   
   to my response that I'm giving to the response that you gave me, lets assume   
   that a customer has enough/more than enough to pay for their purchase.  Using   
   the example that I    
   gave, all that I'm saying is that , for the order total that I used in my   
   example, $20.00 even covers it just fine.  The customer does not *NEED* to   
   also, in addition to the $20.00, give me a nickel.   
      
   --   
   rr-*as opposed to "wants to"/"chooses to"-oger   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)