From: usenet@only.tnx   
      
   On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 07:48:51 -0800 (PST), Roger House <61rroger@gmail.com>   
   wrote:   
   >On Thursday, January 28, 2021 at 8:10:43 AM UTC-5, hymie! wrote:   
   >>In our last episode, the evil Dr. Lacto had captured our hero,   
   >>Roger House <61rr...@gmail.com>, who said:   
   >>   
   >>>2.) In relation to number 1, as an example, if your order total comes   
   >>>to something like, say, $18.02, when you give me your payment money,   
   >>> you do not *NEED* to give me $20.05, twenty even covers it just fine.   
   >>Are you seriously suggesting that it's OK for me, as a customer, to   
   >>make the asumption "Oh, I don't have enough money to cover my entire   
   >>purchase, but I have most of it, and the cashier will accept what I have   
   >>and be satisfied" ?   
   >   
   >No, I'm not suggesting that at all.  For the sake of this discussion relating   
   >to my response that I'm giving to the response that you gave me, lets assume   
   >that a customer has enough/more than enough to pay for their purchase.   
   >Using the example that I gave, all that I'm saying is that , for the order   
   >total that I used in my example, $20.00 even covers it just fine.  The   
   >customer does not *NEED* to also, in addition to the $20.00, give me a nickel.   
      
   So are you saying that you "eat" the two cents and give the customer two   
   dollars   
   back?  Why would you want them to take a dollar bill and ninty-eight cents in   
   coin back as change?  Isn't it easier for both you and the customer to take the   
   nickel and give them two dollar bills and three pennies?   
      
   --   
   Rainy day... dream way... let the sun take a holiday ... lay back and groove on   
   a rainy day.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)