Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.cecil-adams    |    Fans of legendary knowitall Cecil Adams    |    144,831 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 143,533 of 144,831    |
|    artyw2@yahoo.com to Bob    |
|    Re: Ping Richard H.: Why didn't baseball    |
|    07 Mar 21 10:15:22    |
      On Tuesday, March 2, 2021 at 1:47:21 PM UTC-7, Bob wrote:       > On Monday, March 1, 2021 at 5:04:27 PM UTC-5, rrh...@gmail.com wrote:        > > On Monday, February 22, 2021 at 12:14:13 PM UTC-5, Bob wrote:        > > > And by "big", I mean comparably to Japan or India. Did it start to and       get derailed?        > > Major modern professional team sports all, to a surprisingly good       approximation, originated in Britain or North America. The question to answer       is why anyone else took them up. The answer is imperialism, whether explicit       or economic. (Think of, e.g.        Argentina c. 1900. It was an independent country, but its technical       infrastructure was operated and largely owned by the British. If the       Argentines got feisty the Royal Navy could sail into Buenos Aires harbor and       set things straight.) British sporting        culture often was adopted by the local elites, and worked down the social       ladder from there. Hence Indian cricket and Argentine football (soccer).       Japanese baseball was introduced as a delayed part of the Mejii Restoration.       Japan was frantically working        to catch up to the West. Most of this was technology and industry, but all       sorts of cultural flotsam was carried with those. Then after WWII there was an       even stronger imperative to take up American culture. Baseball was already       known, making it an easy        sell. China? They never took to the practices of foreign devils. While the       Western powers could boss the government around for favorable trade deals,       Western culture had little direct impact on the population. I am morally       certain cricket was played in        Hong Kong, but I don't know if it spread to the locals, and it certainly       didn't go far on the mainland.        > >        > > Richard Hershberger       > While this is true, it's not enough to explain the discrepancy between these       sports and soccer in China. Did China adopt soccer fairly late, as part of the       second wave of soccer's expansion to the rest of the world? Or do I simply       over-estimate how big        soccer is in China?       Also, China took up basketball, but not baseball.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca