Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.frank-zappa    |    Underappreciated musical genius    |    39,879 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 38,294 of 39,879    |
|    Batpuller to Ron Spiegelhalter    |
|    Re: I hope Bush wins    |
|    04 Oct 15 19:52:28    |
      From: bunkmunkee@gmail.com              On Thursday, November 9, 2000 at 1:00:00 AM UTC-7, Ron Spiegelhalter wrote:       > I'm starting to think that it would be better if Bush wins this thing.       > Yeah, I voted for G...*cough*. Excuse me, I said I voted for       > G...*choke*...voted for G...*gag*...I voted against Bush. But with this       > thing dragging out the way it is, and the inevitable fallout from all of       > this, I'm thinking it would be better if Bush wins.       >       > Whichever of these guys wins will be getting in as a result of the closest       > election in ages. No mandate there. A huge number of Americans will be       > pissed. Congress will have such a slim Republican majority that it's nearly       > irrelevant. The Senate may even be 50/50. Nothing, and I mean nothing, is       > going to be accomplished in the next four years no matter who's President.       >       > If Bush wins the electoral vote, he will be the first President in many of       > our memories to lose the popular vote. That's not going to help his       > presidency. He enters the Oval Office with an automatic sub-50% approval       > rating. It's happened three times before: Hayes did it in 1876 and ended up       > a one-termer in 1880, Harrison did it in 1888 and ended up a one-termer in       > 1892, Kennedy did it in 1960 and we know what happened to him. The debate       > over abolishing the electoral college will hang over Bush's presidency, many       > Americans will consider his administration illegitimate, and he will be       > ousted in 2004 without having done much damage. Okay, he might get a       > Supreme Court justice in there, but it would have to be a pretty moderate       > nominee to get past such a balanced Congress. And he'll probably end up       > accidentally pissing of a foreign ally or two (Anyone hear what he said to       > Queen Elizabeth? Yeesh!). But the fact is that Gore will fare no better if       > he gets in; in fact he'll probably be even weaker. The only way Gore is       > winning this election is in the courts. That's no way to establish       > presidential authority. That stigma will hang over him even heavier than       > Bush's popular vote loss would. Then he'll be out of there in 2004 and       > we'll probably end up with Bush in a landslide.       >       > Whoever loses this year is very likely to win in 2004 by a healthy margin.       > So we deal with the moron for the next four, then the system corrects       > itself. I don't think there's any need to worry about an effective Bush       > presidency; George W. Bush makes Dan Quayle look like Ronald Reagan. And       > he'll have a gridlocked Congress behind him. So when Bush is declared the       > official winner in Florida, don't panic. The next four years will be fine,       > we'll probably get a good batch of amusing SNL sketches out of it, and we'll       > take care of it in 2004.       >       > ron              Ha ha ha, what a muppetshow!              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca