XPost: alt.free.newsservers, alt.usenet.kooks
From: lectron_n00se@gmail.com
On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 18:30:10 +0200, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt.
What does your directive have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
> I dunno who "the spewbot Paul" is, lectron n00se. No further name was
> specified. I just used that as a generic pointy stick to poke the
> furry-loving queer kook using the alias of 'coyo'.
What does your homophobia have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
> But your having responded with your classic invective makes it pretty
> clear who 'lectron n00se' is, Paul.
Who is "Paul", Emeritus? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias.
>
What does your snickering have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
> How so? Elucidate, verbosely.
What does your question have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
>
What does your snickering have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
> Explain. In detail.
What does your directive have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
>
What does your snickering have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
> Expand upon your theory, at length.
What does your directive have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
> Your failure to do so will constitute your admission that you committed
> a classic erroneous supposition.
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
with free newsservers, Emeritus?
>
What does your snickering have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
> The word 'homophobia' is predicated upon there being a phobia.
What does your pontification have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
> I'm not scared of the braintwisted little dog-fucking faggot.
Who is "the braintwisted little dog-fucking faggot", Emeritus? There is
nobody in this newsgroup using that alias.
> 'Homorevulsion' would be more apropos.
What does your bigotry have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
> Besides, coyo isn't your average, everyday, garden-variety faggot... no,
> this queer little number not only fucks dudes, he's stated that no one
> should judge who a man loves, whether it be another man... or a dog.
What do your foul language and your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
claims have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
> Then he went on to say he looked forward to the day he could *be* a dog
> and get "fur grafts"... so you can see just what sort of pervy stuff
> coyo is into.
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
with free newsservers, Emeritus?
> Bow wow.
>
>
What do your sound effects have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
> Mine was a perfectly logical argument.
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
with free newsservers, Emeritus?
> Coyo would be amongst his own, and the only reason they'd have to make
> fun of the little dog-fucking faggoty freak is because he's so damned
> inferior even to them.
Classic invective, laced with foul language, as expected from someone who
lacks a logical argument.
> So your supposition was classically erroneous, yet again.
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
with free newsservers, Emeritus?
>
What does your snickering have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
> How much time, exactly?
What does your question have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
> Be sure you're accurate to within at least a few minutes, otherwise
> you're admitting your classic erroneous supposition, as expected from
> someone who lacks a logical argument due to their own psychological
> projection of spending way too much time venting on Usenet.
What does your classic unsubstantiated, erroneous, and ironic claim have
to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
>
What does your snickering have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
> Classic truth, given coyo's own admission to an interest in bestiality.
What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with free
newsservers, Emeritus?
> But then, you lack a logical argument in the face of those facts, so
> your classic erroneous supposition is to be expected.
What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with free
newsservers, Emeritus?
>
What does your snickering have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
> Then it's a good thing I didn't capitalize it and treat it as an alias,
> eh? Perhaps you'd do well to address your profound lack of reading
> comprehension before you go erroneously pointing out the supposed
> erroneous suppositions, invective and pontifications of those who are
> more well versed at sussing context than yourself.
How ironic.
> Did you follow that, or shall I dumb it down for you?
What does your question have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
>
What does your snickering have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
> Nothing.
Then why did you post it to a free newsservers newsgroup, Emeritus?
> What does your outing your latest sock have to do with free newservers,
> lectron n00se?
What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with free
newsservers, Emeritus?
>
What does your snickering have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
