XPost: alt.free.newsservers, alt.usenet.kooks
From: FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt.
lectron n00se, in did thusly
jump head first into the wood chipper again:
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 18:30:10 +0200, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> Emeritus wrote:
>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt.
> What does your directive have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
What does your question have to do with free newsservers, Paul?
>> I dunno who "the spewbot Paul" is, lectron n00se. No further name was
>> specified. I just used that as a generic pointy stick to poke the
>> furry-loving queer kook using the alias of 'coyo'.
> What does your homophobia have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
The term "homophobia" is predicated upon there being a phobia, as I've
already told you. I'm not scared of faggots and animal fuckers, I'm
repulsed by them. Of course, this is just another example of you
displaying your reading comprehension problems, given that I've
already told you this in my last post.
>> But your having responded with your classic invective makes it pretty
>> clear who 'lectron n00se' is, Paul.
> Who is "Paul", Emeritus? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
> alias.
What does your question have to do with free newsservers, Paul?
>>
> What does your snickering have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
What does your question have to do with free newsservers, Paul?
>> How so? Elucidate, verbosely.
> What does your question have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
What does your question have to do with free newsservers, Paul?
>>
> What does your snickering have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
What does your question have to do with free newsservers, Paul?
>> Explain. In detail.
> What does your directive have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
What does your question have to do with free newsservers, Paul?
>>
> What does your snickering have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
What does your question have to do with free newsservers, Paul?
>> Expand upon your theory, at length.
> What does your directive have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
What does your question have to do with free newsservers, Paul?
>> Your failure to do so will constitute your admission that you committed
>> a classic erroneous supposition.
> What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
> with free newsservers, Emeritus?
Your admission to having committed a classic erroneous supposition, as
is expected from someone who lacks a logical basis for argument, is
noted, Paul.
>>
> What does your snickering have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
What does your question have to do with free newsservers, Paul?
>> The word 'homophobia' is predicated upon there being a phobia.
> What does your pontification have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
What does your lack of reading comprehension have to do with free
newsservers, Paul?
>> I'm not scared of the braintwisted little dog-fucking faggot.
> Who is "the braintwisted little dog-fucking faggot", Emeritus? There is
> nobody in this newsgroup using that alias.
Then it's a good thing I didn't use it as an alias, innit? But do go
on displaying your reading comprehension problems, Paul.
>> 'Homorevulsion' would be more apropos.
> What does your bigotry have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
Setting standards of behavior is 'bigotry' now, Paul?
Finding bestiality to be a disgusting practice is 'bigotry' now, Paul?
Which small furry animals are you into, Paul?
>> Besides, coyo isn't your average, everyday, garden-variety faggot... no,
>> this queer little number not only fucks dudes, he's stated that no one
>> should judge who a man loves, whether it be another man... or a dog.
> What do your foul language and your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
> claims have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
What does your question have to do with free newsservers, Paul?
>> Then he went on to say he looked forward to the day he could *be* a dog
>> and get "fur grafts"... so you can see just what sort of pervy stuff
>> coyo is into.
> What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
> with free newsservers, Emeritus?
Except it's a claim backed up by coyo's own words. Had you the brains
and reading comprehension to understand anything more than botlike
replies, you'd realize this.
Of course, there's another explanation for your defense of the
furryfucker coyo... and that is that Paul Derbyshire likes fucking
small furry animals just as much as coyo does.
Which small furry animals are you into, Paul?
>> Bow wow.
>>
>>
> What do your sound effects have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
What does your question have to do with free newsservers, Paul?
>> Mine was a perfectly logical argument.
> What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
> with free newsservers, Emeritus?
What does your display of your reading comprehension problems have to
do with free newsservers, Paul?
>> Coyo would be amongst his own, and the only reason they'd have to make
>> fun of the little dog-fucking faggoty freak is because he's so damned
>> inferior even to them.
> Classic invective, laced with foul language, as expected from someone who
> lacks a logical argument.
Keep defending the man who's admitted he looks forward to the day when
man-on-dog relationships aren't looked down upon, and people will
start thinking that Paul Derbyshire is into fucking dogs.
We wouldn't want that to get out, now would we, Paul? Especially
considering that I now have every available email address of residents
in Pembroke. My, how the townsfolk would look at you funny if they
believed you were doing more than just collecting mushrooms out there
in the woods, eh?
You should be more careful about who you defend.
>> So your supposition was classically erroneous, yet again.
> What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
> with free newsservers, Emeritus?
What does your question have to do with free newsservers, Paul?
>>
> What does your snickering have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
What does your question have to do with free newsservers, Paul?
>> How much time, exactly?
> What does your question have to do with free newsservers, Emeritus?
What does your question have to do with free newsservers, Paul?
>> Be sure you're accurate to within at least a few minutes, otherwise
>> you're admitting your classic erroneous supposition, as expected from
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
