Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.furry    |    Some weird cosplay cult worship I think    |    38,514 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 37,530 of 38,514    |
|    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=A7=F1=FChw=F6=A3f?= to Coyo    |
|    Re: 11 Eye-Opening Misconceptions About     |
|    02 Jul 14 06:54:03    |
      From: snuhwolf@yahoo.com              Coyo wrote:       > On 7/1/2014 6:59 PM, Coyo wrote:       >> On 6/30/2014 8:56 AM, §ñühwö£f wrote:       >>> *Anarchy* is a utopian concept and not applicable to humans at this       >>> point in their social and intellectual evolution. "Self governance" wont       >>> work in a population that hasn't agreed to a common goal.       >> People can learn.       >>       >       > BTW: did you know that Gulags and Concentration Camps are closely       > related in terms of ideology?       >       > As bad as Fascism was, Maoism is even worse. Maoist ideology is what       > ultimately led to the creation of Gulags, and both Fascism and Maoism       > are based on flavors of Socialism. Most Socialists will deny this, or       > even claim that Socialism is a form of Anarchism, but it's not. A       > Socialist society cannot function without a State to enforce it.       >       > Even under ideal conditions, you basically have to turn everyone into       > tang. (That's a joke, son, it's a reference to Neon Genesis Evangelion's       > finale, End of Evangelion.)       >       > Now Anarchy, on the other hand, is inherently individualist, and since       > every individual is free to govern him or herself as he or she sees fit,       > so long as it does not infringe on anyone else (in which case, that       > person has every right to kick ass and chew bubble gum), it's       > sustainable even in a semi-educated public. You don't need a       > perfectly-educated or even responsible public to maintain an Anarchist       > society.       >       > If everyone was sane, educated, responsible and self-disciplined, you       > wouldn't even notice that there was no central government making people       > pretend they aren't complete monsters. But that's incredibly unlikely to       > happen, so instead, you remove the restraints, give everyone guns,       > explosives, aircraft and lots of booze and drugs, and let them destroy       > themselves and each other. The sane and/or intelligent ones can live       > comfortably in a tornado or bomb shelter for about 20 years or so. By 40       > years, things should have quieted down.       >       > It's not rocket science.              You have more faith in humans ability than I do. But I'm older and more       experienced :)                            --       http://signon.org/sign/protect-americas-wolves       www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.savewolves.org        _____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____        / __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\        _\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\       /___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca