Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.furry    |    Some weird cosplay cult worship I think    |    38,514 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 37,574 of 38,514    |
|    Dan Skunk to Coyo    |
|    Re: I wonder...    |
|    21 Sep 14 17:35:51    |
      From: danskunk@hotmail.com              On 19/09/2014 8:22 PM, Coyo wrote:       > If it might be possible to come up with an alternative peering protocol       > between Usenet servers besides NNTP. NNTP is based on email, which is       > purely a text-based protocol. As a result, binaries need to be encoded       > as text, first, because it can be transmitted.       >       > As things like MsgPack, ProtoBuf and ZeroMQ become increasingly popular,       > I wonder if an alternative protocol to NNTP would ever catch on and gain       > traction? It seems possible, since Usenet is just a loose decentralized       > federation between autonomous systems. Peering is however the two       > parties decide on doing it, no?       >       > Something for me to chew on. Between Usenet and XMPP, an open Internet       > forum, social network and chat system is not out of reach. The more       > people rely on things like faceboogle, the more closed and inaccessible       > the Internet as a whole becomes.       >       > If people went back to Usenet from Faceboogle and the like, went back       > even further than OStatus or Friendica or Diaspora, but back to Usenet,       > it would be good for the Internet, though maybe not so good for the Web.       >       > A unified XMPP+NNTP+OSim protocol would be pretty cool. However, I       > suspect it won't catch on unless I'm already considered in the big       > leagues, among such august company as Tim Berners-Lee, Richard Stallman,       > Linux Torvalds, Bruce Schneier, Edward Snowden and Julian Assange.       >       > But considering how popular Telehash, BitTorrent, Bitcoin, and similar       > protocols already are, as well as the increasing popularity of OTR,       > ZeroMQ, Protobuf and MsgPack, I suspect I wouldn't be stretching that far.       >       > Anyway, something to chew on.       >       It would basically be a different network, entirely. You could put a       server online and see if anyone's interested in using it. I think you're       probably just re-inventing something that already exists and works--and       isn't very popular anyway, though. Could work, but I'm not too optomistic.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca