From: snuhwolf@yahoo.com   
      
   Dan Skunk wrote:   
   > On 15/01/2015 9:12 AM, §ñühwö£f wrote:   
   >> Dan Skunk wrote:   
   >>> On 11/01/2015 9:35 PM, mkalte wrote:   
   >>>> Am Donnerstag, 8. Januar 2015 07:59:10 UTC+1 schrieb Farry:   
   >>>>> KONRAD  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> I don't think I've looked that this newsgroup in over 14 years.   
   >>>>>> How'r you guys doin?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I guess there's a few of us that still have the group in our   
   >>>>> newsreaders   
   >>>>> because we are still using Usenet for other groups and haven't   
   >>>>> bothered to   
   >>>>> delete this one.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> As for the activity now, in the past couple of months, I see a   
   >>>>> thread of   
   >>>>> idle/surreal banter and a half-hearted attempt to start a game of Yo   
   >>>>> Momma   
   >>>>> Sucks but even those have tailed off.  So what are we doing here?  Not   
   >>>>> much.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> There are still new people appearing here! (Like me)   
   >>>> But... I have admit that it is/was only for historical reasons...   
   >>>>   
   >>> You could always post something new. :)   
   >>   
   >> I got something...tried to watch that Seth MacFarlane thing "Ted"...OMG   
   >> what a load of dreck. I bailed right after Flash Gordon punches the wall   
   >> and the Girlfriend leaves Wallberg. Predictable and unfunny except for a   
   >> few one liners. Plus, the two main characters are totally un-likeable. I   
   >> cant connect with east coast sociopathic duchebags. It was like an   
   >> extended version of Jersey Shore. How'd this fucking train-wreck get   
   >> four stars???   
   >>   
   >> Word.   
   >>   
   > There was a few sharp one liners. I thought it was good for a few   
   > laughs. Had some good one liners and the plot was fairly original   
   > (unlike a lot of other movies lately).   
   >   
   > I dunno about 4 stars. It's probably the novelty of the main character   
   > being a teddy bear that carries it. If he were human, the movie would   
   > just be about douchebags.   
      
   Hmmm...might be a cultural thing. I couldn't connect with the whole East   
   Coast smartass sensibilities the film pushed. For me the two main   
   characters were un-likable. But even *without* sitting thru the whole   
   thing I could see it was a smarmy "redemption" flick where Wallbergs   
   character has to "learn to grow up" so his GF etc will like him for   
   being an "adult". If I'm wrong about the plot, do tell :)   
      
      
   --   
   http://wolfwatcher.org/   
   www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.savewolves.org   
       _____  ____  ____ __ /\_/\ __      _ ______   _____   
      / __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \  \  __\   
     _\ \/    / /_/ / _  / \     / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\  _\   
   /___/_/|_/\____/_//_/   \_@_/   \__|\__|\____/\____\_\   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)