From: ivan@siamics.net   
      
   >>>>> Paul Johnson  writes:   
   >>>>> On Saturday, November 5, 2016 at 11:55:49 AM UTC-5, Ivan Shmakov wrote:   
      
   [...]   
      
    >> news:nva3g2$lth$1@reader2.panix.com   
      
    >> The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply.  Your   
    >> question was:   
      
    >> > Am I on drugs? I just saw a grown man dressed as a My Little Pony.   
      
    >> And in response, thus spake the Oracle:   
      
    >> } Oddly enough, I just had the following question:   
    >> }   
    >> } Am I on drugs? I am at a Brony convention, and I just saw a   
    >> } shire-horse sending an e-mail.   
      
    > Nice, but bronies aren't furries.   
      
   	That depends on the definition in use.  In the most broad sense,   
   	I would define "furries" as persons interested in   
   	"anthropomorphic animals".  To me, that would include MLP fans   
   	all the same as it would include "Nu, pogodi!" ones.   
      
   	One obvious way to put a stricter definition would be to require   
   	for a person to be a fan of at least two sufficiently different   
   	"furry" works.  There, we would, of course, exclude the bronies   
   	who aren't interested in "furry" works apart from MLP: FiM.   
      
    > Also not sure how I missed that...   
      
   --   
   FSF associate member #7257  58F8 0F47 53F5 2EB2 F6A5  8916 3013 B6A0 230E 334A   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)