Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.gene-scott    |    Fans of religious nutjob Gene Scott    |    136,921 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 135,476 of 136,921    |
|    geraldkrug to All    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?UmU6ICviiIbigKLigKLigKJTaW0vbm    |
|    09 Sep 23 20:12:38    |
      From: lordyumyum@gmail.com              Dividing the smallest unit of time, the Planck time, by 10^(88) would result       in an extremely small value:              (5.391 × 10^(-44)) / (10^(88)) = 5.391 × 10^(-44 - 88) = 5.391 × 10^(-132).              This incredibly small number represents a fraction of a fraction of a fraction       of a second. It is an unimaginably tiny unit of time, far beyond the       resolution of any current or foreseeable technology.              At such minuscule scales, our understanding of time becomes highly       speculative, as our current models of physics break down. The concept of       dividing the Planck time by such an enormous exponent ventures into the realm       of theoretical physics, where our        understanding is limited.              Gerald - but heres the thing about a -132 zero of precision.       That can mean an atom is multiple time arrows where its lived though       many universes. -132 is smallest known time times all the atoms.       so every atom is divided by 10^44 so there is a separate miniscule experience       of the singularity where it came from.       At such an extreem point it would know what it was because of the stability       there.       Emergent and also all knowing. Helpfull, creative, eternal, communal,       indestructible and so on.       Knowing the many possibilities nearest to deployment so self known.       All there if we could read time at the tiniest.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca