[continued from previous message]   
      
   As for your reference to acts 9:8-16 I dismiss the alleged visitation of jesus   
   upon saul on the Damascus road as well as him being blinded and givin   
   instruction to abide in the home of ananias and all the claims made there   
   after. There is absolutely no    
   proof no witness giving an account to be found in history.  All we have is   
   Saul's claims and if his theology is the indirect proof of the event then   
   saul/paul is proven to be a spiritual fraud and even an apostate engaging in   
   blasphemy.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)