From: somethingwitty@optusnet.com.au   
      
   "DRosent240"  wrote in message   
   news:20040502010834.04016.00000537@mb-m17.aol.com...   
   >   
   > I dont know if the snappy post was in reference to me, but since, with few   
   > exceptions, they are, I'll pretend it was, I made  reference to being   
   > uncomfortable with stalkign like behavior IMO, and I am, its a personal   
   choice.   
   >   
   > I said what I meant, and meant what I said.   
   >   
   > Picture this, your house is across the street from a park, that ends   
   directly   
   > behind your property.  You have a gate up, but if someone walking along in   
   the   
   > park wants to, they can look into your dining room window and see you   
   having   
   > dinner or a drink.   Sure, they're on public property, sure, its harmless   
   to   
   > look, but, unless you really dont mind being on display all the time, at   
   all   
   > times,  it gets old fast.  Unless you are in a cage, being starred at, two   
   feet   
   > away or twenty feet away,  while you pick your nose or do your nails is   
   > intrusive, IMO.  and remember thats all any of us have here.   
   >   
   > Sure I could close my window, but then I'd be in the dark, why should I   
   have to   
   > live like a hermit because a few rude people treat me like a caged cat in   
   a   
   > box.  That sucks, IMO   
   >   
   > Anyway, I said what I meant and meant what I said.   
   >   
   > I would not like it if someone came to my neighborhood with the express   
   > interest of watching me like some lab experiment in my natural habitat.   
   What   
   > makes me think a George Clooney or Julia Roberts or Brad Pitt feels any   
   less   
   > bothered by it.   
   >   
   > Standing on public property and looking into my window is intrusive, IMO   
   >   
   > I dont know why you "waste your time" since its clear that you are not one   
   of   
   > my personalities I cant answer that for you    
   >   
   > But I see no reason why I should pretend to agree with something when I   
   dont.   
   > I dont like what you did and I said so, much like you did when you didnt   
   agree   
   > with my opinion of Krista Allen and her porn past.   
   >   
   > I stand by what I said, standing on public property looking in my window   
   is   
   > intrusive and just because I work on TV or on the big screen doesnt make   
   it   
   > less so.  Again, IMO   
   >   
   > And people wonder why actors get those high fences and armed guards.   
   >   
   >   
      
      
      
   I have to agree with you on this , there's a big difference from seeing a   
   celeb on the location to finding there address with a star map and then   
   claim but I was on public property.... ask your self this Question would I   
   repeat what I had done if I had met celeb who's house I was looking for   
   answer would be no because deep down you know that you have invaded their   
   privacy????and they would look at you like you were stalking them   
   .....unless you have been stalk you don't know how creepy this behaviour is   
   ....   
      
      
      
      
      
   > >   
   > >"Londoner"  wrote in message   
   > >news:78083087.0404302046.41e42fb@posting.google.com...   
   > >> Sometimes I just wondering why I waste my time sharing my experiences   
   > >> in this site just to read back some estupid comments...   
   > >>   
   > >> I'be been reading this site regularly for few months now and only few   
   > >> times I felt someone appreciate something that I have said or written.   
   > >>   
   > >> I do not expect that none would give a shit for what I'm saying but   
   > >> sometime it really irritated me some of the comments. Since I told   
   > >> that I'm not a stalker I don't know why some people still implicit it   
   > >> in their comments.   
   > >>   
   > >> I just wanted to share few things that I learnt about George. For   
   > >> instance, when I passed by his house in Como, I saw this beautifull   
   > >> boy-and-a-girl esculpture in front of his gate, by the sidewalk.   
   > >> Everybody has seen pictures of his house taken from the lake, since   
   > >> everybody knows where his house is there. He had problems with   
   > >> bugglers there, he installed security there and I guess in Italy it   
   > >> was the right thing to do since people would try to penetrate his   
   > >> house to steal... When I was there, all I care was to take a picture   
   > >> of the little boy-and-girl and I did not even bother to walk besides   
   > >> his property where there is an aisle that folks use to have a sun bath   
   > >> and from where I could imagine someone has a view of his "piece of   
   > >> lake".   
   > >>   
   > >> It is no point in being ridiculous just to get close to some one we   
   > >> admire. I avoid being ridiculous. For this reason, I would not see me   
   > >> trying to get his picture while he is out working, filming, as another   
   > >> day a fan did in Chicago. Even that, I didn't critizise her for being   
   > >> there. She lives in Chicago, she saw a chance to get close enough to   
   > >> get a picture and she is not jumping any security measures for doing   
   > >> it, so, I saw no problem.   
   > >>   
   > >> I explained that the place he lives here in not the White House and he   
   > >> does not feel himself as the President. The path I took is open to the   
   > >> public, there is no sign or gate or nothing that indicate that one is   
   > >> not free to walk there. He lives by a park and like me, hundred of   
   > >> peoples walk there daily. Maybe they are not aware of his house and   
   > >> prefer to other directions that not the one that run behind his house.   
   > >> His gate has no eletric devices and there is no harm in someone   
   > >> walking there just because I was aware that's it was his house.   
   > >>   
   > >> I just looked in its direction and from where I was I could see a   
   > >> little of his court tennis (where I saw The Boys post) and I have to   
   > >> admitted, because there is nobody in the property, I got a little   
   > >> closer to see the Hollywood signal that I found schmaltzy and share my   
   > >> opinion with other fans. I was closer but I was still in the public   
   > >> path, not someone property (he does not own the path as people doesn't   
   > >> own the atreet in front of their house).   
   > >>   
   > >> I said I regret gave that fan his address because I didn't know her in   
   > >> person. Anyway, if she were a phycho, she would had found it by other   
   > >> ways. People with criminal minds or evil intentions would find their   
   > >> ways to their intent.   
   > >>   
   > >> As everybody knows in Hollywood there is a tradition of visiting star   
   > >> homes. There are buses taking people to this or that home, stop in   
   > >> front and people can admire one or another place.. Even the Queen of   
   > >> England has thousand of people daily stare in front of her palace to   
   > >> see the guards changing places or expecting to see her alive (I was in   
   > >> London for ten years and never was curious of seeing her).   
   > >>   
   > >> I'm just saying that because I hate when I say I'm not a stalker and   
   > >> some one say that I am. Months ago were those same people saying that   
   > >> I was a troll. The same people who are mean and horrible in their   
   > >> comments about so many things. Who cares less if someone genuine   
   > >> admires Clooney.   
   > >>   
   > >> I'm in a position that if I were a stalker or if I wanted to break   
   > >> Clooney's privacy, I would have done. If I didn't it is because I will   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)