XPost: alt.fan.keanu-reeves, alt.gossip.celebrities, alt.fan.madonna   
   XPost: alt.fan.coco-lee   
   From: oceanstripclubdjrodney@comcast.net   
      
   Carol Shubert wrote:   
      
   > "oceanstrip"  wrote in message   
   > news:wZednU8JH5re0-ncRVn-uQ@comcast.com...   
   >   
   >    
   > :   
   > : Normal people ...   
   > : But you're trying to communicate with someone/something   
   > : who has a known obssession with you that makes no   
   > : sense and is a driving force in it's life, thus, giving it more   
   > : fuel for it's desire.   
   >   
   >   
   > The only thing that actually encourages Trollzilla is when   
   > someone tells someone else to ignore her - she goes   
   > absolutely rapturous about that and copies and pastes   
   > it for reruns for months into the future, blathering about   
   > "feeders" and "non feeders" and all that nonsense. I   
   > firmly believe she is the sort of bully who thrives on   
   > going her way without confrontation. She disintegrates   
   > into posting childish prattle when anyone takes her   
   > on. I'm of the opinion she really needs her cyber butt   
   > kicked all over usenet. It would do her a world of good,   
   > because her fantasies contribute to her mental illnesses.   
   >   
   > But I understand your point of view - and I get bored with   
   > her very easily. It's also easy to feel a little guilty about   
   > finally going after her because I know she really is sick.   
   >   
   > : ...As I mentioned, if I even read anything it writes   
   > : anymore, it's purely by accident. And it's not because I have it   
   > : killfiled, it's because it's screen names and subject lines are usually   
   > : a dead giveaway. I think you would be well advised to pretend for the   
   > : rest of your life Trollzilla does not exist-that's what I've done for   
   > : the most part.   
   >   
   >   
   > She will abandon me only when she finds a new Carol.   
   > She went after you for a few days when you challenged   
   > her, then recently she was distracted by Roofshadow.   
   > But I have a website as well as a usenet presence, and I   
   > had the experience of losing a newborn - and she's a   
   > slimeball hateful coward who loves to attack people for   
   > no reason at all, so she's not going anywhere, regardless   
   > of what I do, unless she finds someone new to become   
   > her obsession.   
   >   
   > I'm done responding to her in agc. I'd rather talk about   
   > celebrities here anyway.   
   >   
   Yeah, well I guess I should talk anyway. My strategy was just to make   
   her so irrational (like that's possible anymore than she/it already is?)   
   but I kind of grew tired with it quickly. It's just such a waste of   
   time-so don't take anything I say as gospel or a command or anything   
   silly like that, just do what you want. Personally, I would prefer to   
   invest my time and energy in real life relationships and that's my long   
   range plan when I'm not wasting time on the internet anyway. But I do   
   tend to get driven to a cause sometimes in a fanatical fashion and I   
   think it's really important to remove the commander in theif and his   
   band of merry marauders-unfortunately, they're so tied into the courts   
   with their own crooked appointments it's unlikely they'll ever see the   
   justice they deserve. So that's my current obsession and I assume it   
   will fade away after the election, though I'll probably find other   
   avenues for activism. I really think that if the right wing looneys can   
   have morons like Rush Limbaugh on the airwaves just sprouting out   
   nonsensical bullshit day and night, then the left wing/liberals ought to   
   be answering the same way-after all, the target audience is easily   
   influenced idiots (Rush's audience) and virtually anyone with decent   
   broadcasting skill and some experience could do it-so that's something   
   I'd like to explore. And criticism doesn't bother me for the most part,   
   and I also figure why let facts get in the way of a good rant if it   
   mesmerizes an audience? I wonder if this is how the Republicans find   
   their looney tunes hosts? Just offer someone like me a job and give them   
   a script? (or at least a general idea or direction, for example, I   
   understand at Fox News it's forbidden to mention Osama Bin Laden lest   
   you remind the audience Bush has failed to capture him.)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)