From: cray4cool@N0SPAM.C0M   
      
   On 21 Feb 2004 19:17:05 -0800, foaatfm@yahoo.com (Donna) wrote:   
      
   >I want to be careful how I word this because I don't want to encourage   
   >certain people since ignoring is a better tactic. So I'm hoping the   
   >women here will understand me.   
   >   
   >I was thinking, there is something odd about our favorite couple.   
   >Someone already mentioned that there's very little photographic   
   >evidence. There's also no jewelry anywhere in the last two giggle   
   >fests. Not to mention, one of those giggle fests was after V-Day. And   
   >there seems to be some long separations. I'm wondering if maybe   
   >there's very little going on that's even remotely serious. I mean,   
   >saying "couldn't be happier" means nothing because that could be said   
   >all the time by that person. That's the nature of that person. Maybe   
   >it's all been blown out of proportion for the purpose of someone   
   >appearing to be studly. Seriously, why choose someone like that   
   >especially with a campaign getting underway. So maybe "that" was   
   >chosen specifically because of a certain image that evokes studliness,   
   >etc. I'm wondering if a certain two haters could actually be on to   
   >something. No way, right??? Please tell me no!!   
   >   
   >I hope you all understood that.   
      
   I have to laugh my ass off at all the women who can't seem to figure   
   it out that George Clooney somehow isn't into women. It's old news!   
   Get over it already. George Clooney just doesn't get off on women. He   
   likes men!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)