XPost: alt.movies.monster   
   From: mrdirector@nyc.rr.com   
      
   "Fungusamungus"  wrote in message   
   news:K356b.95$KX6.87@nwrdny03.gnilink.net...   
   >   
   > "Mr Director"  wrote in message   
   > news:Ql36b.7440$x_5.3206@twister.nyc.rr.com...   
   > >   
   > > "Wolf"  wrote in message   
   > > news:EVqdnRi3LbxFuMWiXTWJiQ@giganews.com...   
   > >   
   > > > > As a student of filmmaking myself, I ca ntell you there was nothing   
   > > wrong   
   > > > > with the editing of GMK, save for one or two bits.   
   > > >   
   > > > Change majors. Please.   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > If you think G2000 was a better edited film than GMK, I think it is you   
   > that   
   > > needs to change hobbies.   
   > >   
   > >   
   >   
   > I think the point Wolf is trying to make is, you said yourself you're a   
   > filmmaking *student*. That doesn't make you the end all, be all, all   
   knowing   
   > film guy. You could be wrong you know.   
      
   There is nothing wrong with saying judge the film based on its ORIGNAL   
   VERSION, not a tv print. To do that is wrong, no ifs ands or buts about it.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)